Not surprisingly, there are a lot of questions about division realignment. Let's dive in, and keep 'em coming ...
Marcus A. from Peoria, Ill., writes: You wrote, "the good news is that the Big Ten is sure to schedule crossover games between the Huskers and the Eastern powers as much as possible." Isn't the schedule set to a more or less fixed rotation? Without protected rivalries we should see the same number of games, over time, against each team. Or does the Big Ten not use math anymore?
Brian Bennett: As Jim Delany told Adam on Sunday, "In the first 18 years, you're going to see a lot of competition between teams at the top of either division. We call that a bit of parity-based scheduling. You'll see Wisconsin and Nebraska and Iowa playing a lot of competition against Penn State, Ohio State and Michigan." Big Ten leaders aren't dummies. They know that more Nebraska-Ohio State, Wisconsin-Michigan type games are good for TV and good for overall business. They'll do everything they can to make sure those games happen as much as possible without tipping the scales of competitive balance too far.
Lance S. from Greensboro, N.C., writes: I'm surprised you put Wisconsin as a winner [in realignment]. As a lifelong Badger fan, I respect the MN rivalry because of its history, but the teams I REALLY want to beat are Ohio State, Michigan, and Michigan State, in that order. I'd take annual games against any of those three over Iowa any time. The new divisions render the Badgers' regular season as "ho hum". Now the only thing to look forward to will be the Championship game and the bowl game. What a shame!
Brian Bennett: There's no question in my mind that Wisconsin made out well. Let's face it: the Badgers belong in the same division with Iowa, Minnesota and Nebraska, and they are a bit of an outlier in the Leaders. The path to the Big Ten title game looks much, much easier in the West, although Wisconsin doesn't need a lot of help these days. The drawbacks are fewer games with Ohio State and Michigan State, both of which have become good rivalries of late. Still, the positives far outweigh the negatives for Wisconsin.
Hollis Jr. from Supercool Underground Lair writes: If MSU was in the West we would lose even more recruits to big dorky brother and OSU. Collectively the teams in the East seem much closer. For instance, I would go to Maryland for a game, check out the monuments in DC and eat some crab in Annapolis while listening to a local band. I wouldn't go to Nebraska or Iowa under any circumstances.
Brian Bennett: Well, there's the bright side for the Spartans, I suppose. Michigan State does have more in common with its new East Division brethren, and Mark Dantonio's staff recruits Ohio hard. I'm curious to see whether teams in the East will gain a recruiting advantage over time by having more regular exposure in the New York and D.C. recruiting areas. Fans will enjoy the annual games against Ohio State and Penn State, as well as of course Michigan. I like what Mark Hollis told the Detroit Free Press: "Coach Dantonio often talks about seeing the glass half full, and it’s very true in this case. We have a great opportunity before us, and that’s how this entire athletic department is looking at it. We’re viewing this as a positive.” The Spartans have no choice but to embrace this, but it's painfully obvious that their path to Pasadena is about to become as difficult as it's ever been.
Bill from Windy City writes: The Legends and Leaders are dead, and there will be much rejoicing. But is the even-year/odd-year home-game scheduling a little over-determined? "[T]he East division teams will play five Big Ten home games and four Big Ten road games in even-numbered years . . . . The West division teams will play five Big Ten home games and four Big Ten road games in odd-numbered years." Different teams have different scheduling needs to get to seven home games. My Huskers will have to renegotiate the NIU game at Soldier Field. Iowa will have to buy a non-conference home game. Wisconsin has maximum flexibility, but will find it hard to keep an away date with Va Tech. Meanwhile, if the East had only 4 conference home games in 2016: Michigan would already be set for 7 home dates, and 0SU and PSU would only need to flip-flop home-and-home arrangements with Oklahoma and Pitt, respectively, to get to 7. (I guess you could write a whole post on this stuff!) Bottom line, it just seems excessively formalistic. What's the benefit?
Brian Bennett: It's not entirely clear why the Big Ten decided on having the East have the five home games in even-numbered years and the West in odd years. It may have just been random; we'll check on that. But what is clear is that Big Ten schools needed to know when their league games would be so they could start scheduling nonconference opponents. There had been a moratorium on scheduling while this stuff was sorted out, and with opponents often booked years in advance, schools needed answers. Now everybody knows exactly what years they will have only four conference home games, which will most likely mean those schools have to schedule at least three non-league home games in those years. Flipping the odd-even years would have worked out better for Michigan State and Purdue in regards to Notre Dame, but there was no way to do it that wouldn't have affected someone. The athletic directors I talked to were just happy to have some concrete information so they can go about putting together those future schedules.
David from Nashville, Tenn., writes: Regarding your column on Michigan's WR recruiting; yes they really are upgrading the size. But contrary to the seeming implied tone (maybe I'm just misinterrepting it), speed is not always forgotten regardless of what the WR coach says. ... Jehu Chesson was a two time state champion in the 300m hurdles, and his senior year won the state championship in the 100m and 110 hurdles. Da'Mario Jones ran a 10.8 or 10.9 100m in junior year in track. In comparison, Braylon Edwards ran track at Michigan with a personal best of 10.8 in the 100m (ran a 4.38 40 at combine I believe), and he was generally considered a pretty fast dude, and a legitimate downfield threat to out run defenses. Drake Harris doesn't have track times, but he's the only WR in the state of Michigan history to break the 2,000 yard mark, which he did by running away from a lot of defenders (he was also heavily recruited by OSU who you point out very much values speed).
Brian Bennett: Some people probably read too much into Jeff Hecklinski's quote from February and may have thought I was implying Michigan wasn't recruiting fast wide receivers. That's not the case. I think what he meant was that you don't want just track guys who can run fast in a straight line. There is a whole lot more that goes into being a good receiver, as we've seen time and time again. Michigan wants guys with great hand-eye coordination, body control, etc., as well as size. The difference is that in the spread, sometimes speed is the absolute No. 1 priority. What Michigan is doing with the height of its receiving recruits is unique in the Big Ten right now. And the difference between its philosophy at the position and Ohio State's is really interesting and will be fun to track.
John from Madtown writes: Brian, in the contender/pretender post on Michigan State, you indicated contender largely on the play of MSU's defense. In the Big Ten draft post, both you and Adam were bullish on the Buckeye defenders, despite OSU replacing nearly all of their starting front seven. As good as MSU's D has been are you expecting the Buckeyes to have the better D?
Brian Bennett: Good question, John. Remember, in that imaginary draft, eligibility mattered. For example, Ohio State's Noah Spence and Adolphus Washington, both sophomores, would be more valuable in some ways than proven seniors, and Buckeyes linebacker Ryan Shazier, a junior, would have one more year than Michigan State linebacker Max Bullough. But you hit on an interesting point. I'd say the Spartans will have a stronger defense this season, simply because they have fewer question marks than Ohio State, which is replacing its entire front four from last year and needs some guys to step up at linebacker. But the Buckeyes probably have more star power than the Spartans, with guys like Shazier and Bradley Roby and possibly Spence and Noah.
As good as Michigan State's 'D' has been the past couple of years, it has been viewed as more of a team effort than one led by individual stars. Only three Spartans defenders made the first team All-Big Ten team as voted by the coaches last year (and none were on the coaches' second team), while none made it on the media's first team. And that was from a Top 5 national defense. For whatever reason, the individual accolades haven't necessarily accompanied Michigan State's success as a total defense.
Anthony from Iowa City writes: I know Iowa offensive coordinator Greg Davis is wanting vertical passes (doesn't everyone here) but.....I see another offense where sideways passing is going to happen. There just isn't any playmakers that can make those verticle catches (unless a reciever comes out of nowhere) I see Damon Bullock get a pass to the side and rely on C.J. Fiedorowicz and Mark Weisman to block. I'd love to see them only have to make 4 plays to move the field 60-80 yards and back up the defense quick, but I also have that feeling that we're going to see a lot of nothing from the offense again. But hey, if Johnny Football can come out of nowhere and win the Heisman, why not Jake Rudock?
Brian Bennett: Well, that is most assuredly the first time I've heard Jake Rudock's name mentioned in conjunction with the Heisman Trophy, so kudos on that. Look, Davis understands as well as anyone that Iowa isn't blessed with great wide receivers who can create tons of separation. The goal is for the running game to be so good that teams have to load up the box, freeing receivers down the field on play-action. If that sounds overly ambitious, just remember how wide open many of Wisconsin's wide receivers have been in recent years. The Hawkeyes have a ways to go to produce like Wisconsin on the ground, but with an experienced offensive line and a deep -- for now -- stable of running backs, it is possible.
Anthony Z. from South St. Paul, Minn., writes: What excuse do you or or counterpart have for not making it up to Minnesota?. Went to Nebraska, Wisconsin, and if Iowa would have gone to a bowl game rest assured either one of you would have been there. So what's the deal? Lazy?
Brian Bennett: You can call us Big Ten bloggers a lot of things, but I don't think "lazy" is one of them. I mean, just look at our output. I think I can speak for Adam when I say spring trips are one of the highlights of our year, because we get a chance to talk to a lot of players and coaches, watch practices and gather tons of information in a setting where everyone is more relaxed and often more open than during the season. If it were solely up to us, we'd visit every school and spend several days on each campus. Unfortunately, in the real world there are things like travel and expense budgets, and our editors have to approve our trips. As much as we've both been dying to get to Minneapolis, it's not an easy drive for either of us and the Gophers haven't won enough lately to merit national coverage. Hopefully, that will be changing soon.