Mailbag: So about these coordinators ...

Q:I've had a couple of frustrating years watching football, being a Notre Dame fan and a Bears fan. I can't believe how bad our defense has been in Chicago. Do you think it's time to look in a different direction on defense other than running the Tampa 2? It seems to me teams have figured it out and we are too ignorant to see that. -- Josh Perando, Baltimore

A: Indianapolis should prove to everybody that certain elements of the Cover 2 defense still work when the front four is able to pressure the quarterback. That's what separates a team like the Colts from the Bears. Indianapolis starts Dwight Freeney (13.5 sacks) and Robert Mathis (9.5 sacks) at defensive end, whereas the Bears have struggled to apply constant pressure up front for the past three seasons. It also doesn't hurt that the Colts have a huge playmaking safety in Antoine Bethea (four interceptions), while Lovie Smith has endlessly shuffled players in and out of the safety.

Smith is accurate when he talks about the scheme still being sound, but you must have the proper personnel on the field for it to operate properly. Isn't that the basic definition of coaching? Are the Bears putting their players in the best position to succeed on defense? Many would say no, and that's tough to argue.

Q: Doug Plank? Why is his name not being mentioned/highlighted/screamed when talking about the open Bears defensive coordinator position? -- Michael, Orange County, Calif.

A: Although Plank was a successful head coach in the Arena Football League, he was only an assistant defensive backs coach with the Jets. Going from that rank to NFL defensive coordinator seems like a pretty big jump, especially since Plank was just fired by Rex Ryan. It's also tough to say if Plank has any knowledge of the system Smith runs here in Chicago, because obviously, that's going to play a huge role in who gets the job. Plank was a great player in Chicago, but I view him as a long shot to join this Bears coaching staff.

Q: So I read a while ago that Brian Billick was on the list for possible offensive coordinators. What is going on with that now? Is he still on the list? -- Joel, West Hartford, Conn.

A: Billick would be a major coup for the Bears, but he probably is waiting for a head-coaching opportunity somewhere in the future. I can't say for sure, but perhaps the idea of leaving a secure television gig for the Bears isn't all that appealing to the former Ravens head coach. Billick is also fairly close with Ron Turner, so who knows what he really thinks about the Bears' organization? On the other hand, Billick did work with Bears offensive line coach Mike Tice in Minnesota, and knows the offensive personnel because of his work in the media. Again, it's probably a long shot, but if Billick was actually interested, the Bears would be foolish to pass him up.

ESPNChicago.com Bears mailbag

Bears blogHave a Bears question? Ask ESPN Chicago beat writer Jeff Dickerson. Submit a question

Q: Why not make a push for Bill Cowher? I had heard it was rumored he wanted the job. Lovie can fire all of the coordinators he wants, but his ineffectiveness, and "safe" play-calling (go for it once on fourth down please!) is what continually has hampered the Bears. -- Mark Milbourn, Tucson, Ariz.

A: Obviously, Cowher is out of the equation for 2010. There is no chance the Bears pay the remaining two years left on Smith's deal, then sign Cowher to a monster contract -- especially since there could be a work stoppage in 2011. However, Cowher would be a strong candidate to take over next year if Smith gets fired, but that's a long way off. Think of it this way; the Bears can't even find coordinators for 2010, do you really think they've planned ahead for a possible hire in 2011?

Q: With a couple of the Bears' defensive ends becoming free agents this year, do you believe it would be wise for to pursue Aaron Kampman? I think he a quality end in a 4-3 scheme, he rushes the passer well and is equally impressive in run defense. Not to mention he could fill a leadership role on the defensive line, which if you ask me, we have been lacking. -- David Janklow, Lacey, Wa.

A: This is a tricky subject on many levels. First, Kampman is recovering from a torn anterior cruciate ligament, so he could theoretically wait until he's fully recovered to sign a deal, which may not be until the summer. It would make sense from a financial standpoint for Kampman to show teams he's healthy before accepting any sort of contract.

Secondly, Green Bay may still choose to apply the franchise tag to Kampman, which would take the Bears out of the running. Now, let's say (1) Kampman is not tagged, and (2) fully recovers from the ACL injury in time for training camp, then yes, he would be a guy to target. It was obvious last season Kampman is not cut out to be an outside linebacker in a 3-4 defense, but he recorded a combined 37 sacks the previous three years playing end in a 4-3.

The Bears desperately need someone to rush the passer, and Kampman has a proven track record of success in that department. However, since 2010 will probably be an uncapped year, it's impossible to predict what kind of price Kampman will demand on the open market if healthy. But to answer your question, I think Kampman would be a major upgrade for the Bears' defense, and should be pursued if available.