They have similar builds (Olsen 6 foot 5, 255 pounds; Celek 6-4, 255).
Both were taken in the 2007 draft (Olsen first round / Celek fifth round).
Their statistics are fairly comparable (Olsen 47 receptions, 448 yards, 6 TDs; Celek 54 receptions, 601 yards, 5 TDs).One major difference: Celek got paid.The Eagles tight end just agreed to a six-year contract extension, worth $33 million, with $11 million guaranteed, according to ESPN.com’s Matt Mosley. Remember the conversation this summer about Olsen receiving a new deal? That idea likely has been put on hold, for now, especially since Olsen is signed through 2011. But I still view Olsen as a guy I want around for the foreseeable future.Why?
Despite his struggles as a blocker, Olsen still adds a lot of value to the passing game. Maybe the Bears should just utilize Olsen as a receiver, and put him strictly in the slot or split out wide -- I’m certainly not the first to suggest this possibility. Why keep asking Olsen to do something he isn’t capable of? It would be like asking me to teach advanced calculus (I got a C in basic geometry).
Back to Celek for a second. Remember, he has the luxury of playing with speedster DeSean Jackson and rookie Jeremy Maclin. Who is taking the pressure off Olsen? Maybe when Jay Cutler stops feeling pressure on every snap (or is actually allowed to roll outside the pocket), Olsen finally will put up those monster numbers many predicted during training camp. Or maybe the Bears find a few legitimate receivers to compliment Olsen. Johnny Knox is off to a great start, but how about a true No. 1? Or even a proven No. 2?
That would be nice.