<
>

Gene Smith addresses media

If you think you've had a busy week, imagine being Ohio State athletics director Gene Smith. On Tuesday, Smith spent the better part of his day dealing with Tressel-Gate 2011. (For more on that gag-worthy display, read our own Mark Schlabach's excellent column here.) A day later, Smith donned his other cap -- as chair of NCAA tournament selection committee -- and sat down to answer questions from reporters on the vagaries of the bracket process.

There were no fireworks (Smith politely asked reporters to confine their questions to the NCAA tournament) and no major revelations, but the answers on the tourney seeding process were interesting all the same.

Among the notable nuggets:

  • Smith reminded reporters that the committee no longer subscribes to any official "last 12 games" criteria, but that each committee member can take each team's recent performance into consideration if he or she so desires. Basically, how your team's recent performance will be viewed depends on the subjective whim of each committee member.

  • Smith said the committee will put injuries -- and how teams perform with and without their injured players -- into consideration in inclusion and seeding. He also said the committee "relied on information from the schools," which presents problems, because a school (cough, Syracuse, cough) has a vested interest in making it seem like a player is going to play even if he isn't. But what else can the committee do? Look at the x-rays themselves?

  • Smith said the committee works with schools on travel issues, and that it takes travel logistics seriously, but that it won't sacrifice the overall integrity of the seeding process simply for the sake of travel.

  • Smith was asked how the committee would seed the First Four. Specifically, how would Smith and Co. balance mid-majors vs. at-larges in Dayton?

  • According to Smith, the committee will submit their first ballots at about 4 p.m. ET today. It is impossible to read that sentence without getting irrationally excited.

The lightly edited transcript of Smith's rather short Wednesday teleconference is reprinted below:

Q: I was wondering if you could restate your committee's policy on whether more emphasis is placed on the last 10 or 12 games a team plays or if all of the season has equal emphasis?

Smith: As you know, most people know, for a period of time we had the last 10 or the last 12 on nitty gritty sheets. We decided a couple years ago to eliminate that consideration. We leave that to each individual committee member to determine if that's an important criteria for them.

It's not an important criteria for the entire committee that we focus on it like we did for that short period of time. Each committee member takes it into consideration in their own way.

Q: A couple teams out there, including Florida State and Georgetown, that don't have key players at least at this point, haven't had them for the last couple of weeks. Georgetown specifically has lost some games. We don't know yet if Chris is going to be able to play at all in the Big East tournament. How do you approach that? Also with Florida State, considering they have won some games without Singleton, how do you approach looking at those teams as you sit down and decide?

Smith: We take missing players and coaches into consideration as we look at the teams. We rely on information from the schools. We rely on information from the conference relative to their status. But we still look at how those teamed performed at the end of the day. We look at how those teams responded to the adversity they faced, whether they lost a player early, got them back, were able to sustain. We kind of take it into consideration based upon the situation.

So we've had a chance to see different teams with injured players, with players who became injured, without. We always take it into consideration.

Q. With so much attention being given to the first four, how sensitive is the committee to the scrutiny you're sure to receive on which teams are selected, if they're from mid majors, power conferences? Do you think that will go into consideration at all? My second question is, what are you doing to make sure that the experience in Dayton is a true NCAA tournament experience for all the participants?

Smith: I'll answer your second question first. The reason we went to Dayton is because Dayton demonstrated historically the ability to attract fans and provide a quality experience for the student athletes, the coaches and the fans. They came to Dayton. We feel very confident with Dayton as a host, how they operate, that these people will have a great experience. We're prepared to manage the travel issues they will encounter, try to make it as seamless a transition for them as we possibly can. We have a first class television crew in Jim Nantz, Clark Kellogg and Steve Kerr. The awareness to the exposure these young people will receive is at the highest level.

We will go through our normal process of selecting, seeding and bracketing. We will go through 1 through 68. We're very confident in the 35th, 36th, 37th slots that the at large teams going to Dayton will be excited to go. This is March Madness. Whether it's the first four or the first eight at the top of the bracket, people are going to analyze, they're going to debate, be excited, disagree. That's part of what this is, part of what we're blessed to serve, is that excitement that comes with March Madness. The first four, relative to your question, is new. Every single year we evaluate what we did the previous year. In May and in June when we have our meetings to look back at the tournament, the first four will go under its first scrutiny with the committee. Anything that we feel we need to modify based on that experience we'll modify. So we're excited about it. Our biggest emphasis is what you talked about, making sure that the teams and the coaches and the fans that follow them come and just have a great experience in Dayton. We're really excited about it.

Q. I wanted to ask you about teams that are kind of out there, maybe not even quite on the bubble, how much a team can do in a conference tournament, short of winning it, to get a bid? How many teams out there are in that mode where they can still play their way in?

Smith: I really can't tell you and speculate how many teams are like that. We will submit our first ballots this afternoon probably around [4 p.m. ET] after we do administrative work, talk about teams. Certainly a team or teams have an opportunity to get some quality wins to add to their résumé. But, really, there's five thousand games played throughout the season. The tournament is very small compared to the number of games that are played during the gauntlet, which is the regular season. Really you might be able to have an impact in your first game, depending when your tournament is, maybe your second game. The reality is [the teams that will be] most advantaged by the tournament are those who come through and win it and become automatic qualifiers. A team can enhance their résumé a little bit.

Q. How committed is the committee to putting the first four participants into a second and third-round site nearby Dayton? Is there one predominant challenge in dealing with this whole 'first four' concept this year?

Smith: We will do everything we can to pay close attention to geography and respect travel. We try to do that every year. But we won't sacrifice the integrity of the seeding process to do that. So it's likely that we could have a team coming from an out of market distance to Dayton. We have prepared. We've done our preplanning to be able to on Sunday help those institutions with travel. We're really lucky because we have sites in D.C., Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland that are options, reasonable options, for those teams to advance to. We have things set up for us in a good way when we face that moment. Hopefully we can respect geography.

Again, so everybody is aware, we will not sacrifice seed for that. We go through a tough process to seed teams appropriately and with respect to the competition nationally. So we won't step out of that in order to address the geography issues. As it is, we'll do the best we can.