1. Mike Shanahan keeps saying he'll meet with owner Dan Snyder after the season and until that happens there is no decision on his future. OK. But I just don't see him returning because at this point it doesn't make any sense. I'll just say this: The Redskins will not get caught flat-footed looking for his successor, like they were when Joe Gibbs resigned after the 2007 season.
2. Regardless if owner Dan Snyder still likes Shanahan or not, you just reach a point where you say change is necessary. Continuity is good and the Redskins need it; they'll soon be on their fourth head coach in seven seasons. They've changed schemes and personnel too often and it's a brutal way to try and win. But you don't become good because you're stable, you become stable because you're good. That's why the Steelers and Patriots and other patient teams don't panic after a bad year or two. The organizational foundation is there. Take away all the stories that have come out and at 3-12 it would still be difficult to justify another season. It's become a football decision as much as anything. There are smart coaches here, but the bottom line is the Redskins are 24-39 in the past four seasons and facing more roster turnover.
3. You could predict the Steve Spurrier 5-11 season; you could see the Jim Zorn collapse as well. Neither one of those regimes had a chance for a number of reasons. This season? Maybe a 6-10 season because of Robert Griffin III's knee and some issues related to the cap. But possibly 3-13? No way. The last time I covered a 3-13 season was Norv Turner's first year and that was the first step of a massive rebuild. This was in Year 4 of a regime that showed promise a year ago at this time. When they hired Shanahan to pair with general manager Bruce Allen, my thought was that, if nothing else, the Redskins wouldn't suffer through this sort of season. And now they have. It's an all-around debacle.
4. I don't know who the next head coach will be, but I know Baylor's Art Briles' name will always be mentioned because of his connection to Robert Griffin III. Yes, it already has been, though mostly to say he'd be receptive to the job. I've said it before and will say it again: That would be a major risk and put too much pressure on Griffin. One respected veteran, who likes Griffin, said of that possibility, “It would be bad for him and it would be bad for the locker room. It would put him in a tight spot.” Just because of the perception players would have that Griffin played a role in Shanahan's ouster in order to get his college coach hired. Not a good look.
5. Now, onto the field. Maybe I'll change my mind after watching Kirk Cousins again in the next couple days, but he was rather ordinary Sunday. He did not play like a guy that will force other teams to surrender a high pick for him in May. He needs time and it would not be the worst thing in the world, at all, for the Redskins to bring him back as insurance for Griffin.
6. Cousins threw another interception on an inside route. Like with the two picks last week, Cousins failed to lead receiver Santana Moss; wasn't wild about the QB's footwork on the play. Maybe Moss should have caught the ball, though few I think would have. Instead he tried to turn around and it caromed off his hands. I like that Cousins owns his mistakes. But there were a few other passes that were nearly intercepted (this is where it's helpful to watch the game again to get a stronger feel for what happened. I do know on one it didn't look like Josh Morgan did a whole lot to help him out).
7. I still like that Cousins does not lock onto one receiver. He also made a nice throw on a 19-yard pass to Pierre Garcon in which right tackle Tyler Polumbus' presence prevented Cousins from stepping into the throw. Cousins has to go through so many situations before you can do more than guesswork about his future. I didn't like that Cousins failed in the fourth quarter, completing 2 of 8 passes for 18 yards. It was a chance for him to carve out a place for himself in this rivalry and he couldn't get the job done. It's not all on him, but he would have received the glory, so ...
8. The inability to pressure with four defenders was a problem for much of the year and it was again Sunday, especially after Brian Orakpo went out. But even with Orakpo the rush was too quiet, except for when they paired he and Ryan Kerrigan on the left side. They ran a blitz to free up Brandon Meriweather running wide, with the others inside. Meriweather was unblocked. Kerrigan ran a stunt to the inside for his sack. An end with pass-rush skills needs to be found.
9. But mostly nothing came from the rush. Every time they've played Tony Romo and he gets that much time he beats them. They're not good enough in zone coverage to let Romo have that sort of time. On the touchdown, the Redskins were in a zone and used a four-man rush. The coverage did well initially because Romo couldn't find anyone. But he had too much time, slipped to his right and corner DeAngelo Hall said he was concerned for Meriweather in the back of the end zone with Dez Bryant. So Hall sunk deeper. Meanwhile, with linebacker Perry Riley playing inside and reading Romo's eyes, that left DeMarco Murray open in the flat. Hall said he thought Riley might slide over to get the back; Riley said he did not know Hall had sunk so deep. You can't give Romo that sort of time.
10. The ability to extend plays in the red zone is why mobile quarterbacks are so valuable. Romo passed up opportunities to run so it's not about him gaining yards with his legs. His 51-yard pass to receiver Terrance Williams came from him extending the play. Once Griffin reaches the point where he understands it's just about extending plays he'll be more dangerous. “That's what makes Robert so dangerous and makes all the mobile quarterbacks so dangerous,” Redskins corner Josh Wilson said. “When they're out of the pocket, it's not on a designed play so it's draw it up in the dirt. It's tough for a defender.”