Originally Published: June 5, 2014

Top 50 coaches: No. 22 Tommy Amaker

By ESPN.com

 Tommy AmakerKirby Lee/USA TODAY SportsTommy Amaker's time at Michigan did not go as planned, but he's built a powerful program at Harvard.

Editor's note: Over the next five weeks, we will reveal the top 50 coaches in college basketball as decided by our ESPN Forecast panel. Today we unveil No. 22: Harvard's Tommy Amaker. On Friday, we release No. 21.


I still remember how dreary the whole thing felt.

It was late February 2007, and I was covering the basketball beat for my student newspaper. My first trip to Ann Arbor, Michigan -- my first time in the Crisler Center, ground zero for my requisite early-'90s Fab Five idols -- was as gray as the weather outside. The building had as much personality, and as much concrete, as a Soviet-era housing block. Michigan's players looked mostly disengaged. The fans were good, particularly the student section, but the game was pretty ugly. And all afternoon, from the sideline to the postgame news conference, Michigan coach Tommy Amaker looked like he was miserable.

About a month later, Michigan would fire Amaker, and Amaker would accept the job at Harvard. I didn't think much of it. Who did? (I was a senior in college, so hoops-coach realpolitik was not exactly foremost among my thoughts back then, but still.) Amaker was receding from the Big Ten and taking a job at a historically bereft Ivy League school, never to be heard from again.

So much for that. In 2008, Amaker inherited a program whose only NCAA tournament berth came in 1946, which had never won an Ivy League title. In the seven seasons since, Amaker has taken the Crimson to three NCAA tournaments, won two games while there, earned the school's first top 25 ranking, competed for some of the nation's best recruits, riled up all kinds of "Harvard: Just like any other college basketball program?!?" anger and completely redeemed himself.

It is unthinkable that Amaker, back when he was at a school with far greater resources and athletic motivation, would ever rank as high as No. 23 in a survey like our Top 50 Coaches ESPN Forecast. It's almost ironic, maybe, that Amaker was fired for never making the NCAA tournament at Michigan before eventually taking Harvard -- Harvard! -- to three straight March appearances. But here we are, and the esteem accorded him has risen exponentially.

How has Harvard gone from nothing to the class of the Ivy League in less than a decade? Recruiting is probably 80 percent of the answer. He had some help, too: Amaker's hiring came shortly after Harvard announced that families with yearly incomes of $60,000 or less would not be expected to pay anything for their student's education. Families earning between $60,000 and $180,000 would pay no more than 10 percent of their income. When your endowment is $30 billion, and you want to prove to the world that intelligence and drive -- and not familial wealth -- are the only criteria that matter, you can do these sorts of things.

No policy had more of an effect on what Amaker could do at Harvard. The Ivy League still doesn't offer scholarships, but for many players' families, the possibility of going $200,000 into debt to send your son to play basketball at Harvard -- when that same son could get a full ride to a bunch of other schools -- is no longer a prohibition. Since the change took effect, Amaker's recruiting has snowballed: Not only is he consistently recruiting the best players in Harvard hoops history, there may be no stretch in Ivy League lore that has brought so many talented basketball players to one school this quickly. This influx has not been without its minor controversies: Other Ivies alleged that Harvard relaxed its academic index standards for incoming athletes, charges the school has consistently denied. Amaker also got into hot water for a secondary recruiting violation in 2010.

Weighed against the lofty ambitions of the Ivy League, these criticisms feel crucial. Weighed against the rest of men's collegiate basketball, they're pretty silly. This is still Harvard, after all. Amaker is pulling from a vastly smaller number of players than most schools in the country.

Which gets to the heart of the job he's done since he left those dreary, unsuccessful days in Ann Arbor behind him. Amaker hasn't just made Harvard good relative to Harvard's own past. He hasn't just mastered the Ivy League. He's built a program that is recruiting against, and playing basketball at the same level as, the top 30 or 40 programs in the country. At Harvard. And the Crimson are only getting better.

-- Eamonn Brennan


Previous installments: Nos. 50-25 No. 24: Bob McKillop No. 23: Greg McDermott

Full Top 50 Coaches List

No. 50: Tie -- Randy Bennett, Saint Mary's; Scott Drew, Baylor


No. 49: Richard Pitino, Minnesota


No. 48: Stew Morrill, Utah State


No. 47: Bob Hoffman, Mercer


No. 46: John Thompson III, Georgetown


No. 45: Mike Brey, Notre Dame


No. 44: Rick Barnes, Texas


No. 43: Chris Mack, Xavier


No. 42: Josh Pastner, Memphis


No. 41: Ed Cooley, Providence


No. 40: Bruce Weber, Kansas State


No. 39: Tubby Smith, Texas Tech


No. 38: Buzz Williams, Virginia Tech


No. 37: Rick Byrd, Belmont


No. 36: Steve Alford, UCLA


No. 35: Phil Martelli, Saint Joseph's


No. 34: Tad Boyle, Colorado


No. 33: Fran McCaffery, Iowa


No. 32: Tim Miles, Nebraska


No. 31: Lon Kruger, Oklahoma


No. 30: Bob Huggins, West Virginia


No. 29: Jim Crews, Saint Louis


No. 28: Jim Larranaga, Miami


No. 27: Mick Cronin, Cincinnati


No. 26: Archie Miller, Dayton


No. 25: Jamie Dixon, Pittsburgh


No. 24: Bob McKillop, Davidson


No. 23: Greg McDermott, Creighton


No. 22: Tommy Amaker, Harvard


Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.


SPONSORED HEADLINES