Tailback suspended for misleading investigators

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Ohio State star tailback Maurice Clarett's
suspension was for misleading investigators who were looking into
alleged off-the-field problems, athletic director Andy Geiger said

The NCAA and Ohio State began an investigation in July into
Clarett's claim that more than $10,000 in clothing, CDs, cash and
stereo equipment was stolen in April from a 2001 Chevrolet Monte
Carlo that Clarett borrowed from a local dealership.

Before Saturday night's game against Washington, Geiger said he
didn't know if Ohio State would have a response to the NCAA's list
of allegations against Clarett before the end of next week. He also
said that the response could end up being "150 pages" long.

Clarett is practicing with the defending national champions but
is not permitted to play while the NCAA and Ohio State continue
probing academic and legal problems for the sophomore.

Wearing a bright red Ohio State warmup suit, Clarett watched the
game Saturday from the sideline near his teammates. He came on the
field during warmups wearing his No. 13 game jersey.

Clarett cheered his team and waved a towel while standing on the
bench as the No. 2-ranked Buckeyes beat Washington (No. 19 ESPN/USA Today, No. 17 AP) 28-9.

Maurice Hall rushed for 58 yards on 15 carries and Lydell Ross
had 43 yards on 12 attempts in Clarett's absence. The Buckeyes, who
averaged 191.3 rushing yards per game last year during their
national championship run, totaled 142 yards.

"Maurice was excited about Lydell and Mo Hall," Ohio State's
Chris Gamble said. "He looked like he was having fun."

Geiger said that Clarett was suspended because he did not abide
by the NCAA's Bylaw 10, which compels athletes and coaches to
answer truthfully when confronted by university or NCAA questions.

"Bylaw 10 is about ethical conduct," Geiger said. "It deals
with telling the truth to the NCAA and to the institution. The
institution is a part of the investigation."

The NCAA's Bylaw 10.d reads, "Unethical conduct by a
prospective or enrolled student-athlete ... may include but is not
limited to the following: knowingly furnishing the NCAA or the
individual's institution false or misleading information concerning
the individual's involvement in or knowledge of matters relevant to
a possible violation of an NCAA regulation."

Even though the NCAA -- and by extension, member institutions --
do not have subpoena power -- Geiger said Bylaw 10 is one of the
underpinnings of maintaining eligibility.

"The NCAA does not use an oath. You don't put your hand on a
Bible and raise your hand," he said. "You're given Bylaw 10.
You're asked do you know about Bylaw 10, have you read Bylaw 10, do
you understand Bylaw 10?"

Clarett's attorney, Scott Schiff, did not immediately return a
request for comment left at his office. Clarett's mother, Michelle
Clarett, could not be reached for comment at her Youngstown, Ohio,

Clarett, who had an Ohio State freshman record 1,237 yards
rushing and 18 touchdowns, was held out of preseason practices
while the NCAA and university looked into questions about his

Clarett was suspended by the university on Aug. 22, although he
was allowed to rejoin the team to practice. He was not in uniform
for the game against Washington.

The NCAA contacted Ohio State with "several pages" of
allegations and the university's athletic department is working on
a response. Geiger said Saturday that the response was not close to
being completed and that he didn't know when it would be sent to
the NCAA. He said the response may not be ready by the end of next

Asked if Ohio State's investigators are having difficulty
answering some of the questions prompted by the NCAA's list of
allegations, Geiger said the university was uncovering new problems
during the investigation that were extending the process.

The university is also looking into a teaching assistant's
charges that athletes -- including Clarett -- received improper help
in class. That investigation is separate from the one that led to
Clarett's suspension.