SportsNation Blog ArchivesSN Blog Archives Cycling

Lance Armstrong finally came clean on Thursday night in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, admitting to using performance-enhancing drugs during his run as a seven-time Tour de France champion. Armstrong said he deserved the scrutiny he's been getting as a result of his use of PEDs, including the stripping of his titles and his lifetime ban from cycling. Cycling authorities don't seem to be buying his remorse, but how do you feel about it?

Has your opinion changed?

''I went and looked up the definition of cheat, and the definition is to gain an advantage on a rival or foe. I didn't view it that way. I viewed it as a level playing field.'' -- Lance Armstrong


Do you believe him?

''This story was so perfect for so long. It's this myth, this perfect story, and it wasn't true. I viewed this situation as one big lie that I repeated a lot of times, and as you said, it wasn't as if I just said no and I moved off it.'' -- Lance Armstrong


Will he admit it under oath?

''... if he is sincere in his desire to correct his past mistakes, he will testify under oath about the full extent of his doping activities.''
-- USADA chief Travis Tygart


Should he have named names?

''There are people in this story, they're good people and we've all made mistakes -- they're not monsters, not toxic and not evil ... ''
-- Lance Armstrong


How did Oprah do?

''Were you a bully?'''
''Was it a big deal to you? Did it feel wrong?''
''Did you feel in any way that you were cheating?''
--Oprah Winfrey


Comment »


Lance Armstrong's fall from grace continued this week, as cycling's governing body stripped him of all of his record seven Tour de France victories. This is a humongous blow for Armstrong, who has seen his personal image run through the wringer ever since 11 of his former teammates testified about his performance-enhancing drug use to USADA. Armstrong's titles may be vacated, but he still has legions of supporters, although his cycling (and endorsement) career is likely over.

Vacated title?

It's always tricky to handle vacated titles -- you want to give the second-place finisher some closure, but there's always the danger that you'll have to vacate the title all over again.


Personal opinion?

Armstrong has done an awful lot for cancer awareness, but the picture his former teammates painted of him is less-than-flattering.


Comment »


Lance Armstrong and Nike have had a close working relationship for a while, but with evidence mounting against the legendary cyclist, the apparel company has decided to drop Armstrong from his endorsement deal. This news comes on the same day that Armstrong announced he was stepping down as chair of his Livestrong cancer-fighting charity. Do you support Nike's actions?

PollCenter: Do you still consider Armstrong to be a role model? What will his legacy be?

Comment »


Lance Armstrong has given up his fight against allegations that he used performance-enhancing drugs. He likely will be banned from cycling for life and stripped of his record seven Tour de France wins, as well as possibly losing his bronze medal from the 2000 Olympics. Armstrong struck a defiant tone in a statement, but this must be a massive blow to a man who redefined cycling in the modern age.

Do you believe Armstrong?

Armstrong described the claims as "nonsense," but declining to fight the charges could be seen as an admission of guilt.


Was the punishment appropriate?

Armstrong's impact on cycling was massive, but those seven Tour wins likely will be vacated.


Are his victories legit?

Regardless of what USADA says, Armstrong did win those titles, even if they're later declared to be illegitimate.


Comment »

Alberto Contador took the yellow jersey on Sunday at the Tour de France with Astana teammate Lance Armstrong moving up to second place in the standings but still losing time overall to Contador.

Armstrong, 37, is now saying he won't make a move to overtake his teammate in an effort to win his seventh Tour title. Our question for you is, will a loss here diminish Lance's legacy?


Case closed. Lance was solid today, for a 37-year-old, that was out of this world. But Contador is the man. He will continue to dominate in the mountains and he's vastly improved in the TT, too. In all fairness, this could've been his third straight TdF title if they didn't absurdly bar the Astana team last year. He doesn't have anything else to prove as he's already won a Giro and Vuelta and now headed for a second Tour win.

-- Berlinzoo

Contador again shows he is in a class of his own on the climbs. Lance is doing great for being out of the sport for so long and at age 37. Watch out for wiggins though, he could spoil the Astana party. ... To me. Lance not winning doesn't do anything to diminish his legacy. He won 7, and if he is competitive after a 4 year layoff at age 37, what more can you ask?

-- brentsod

Good stage today. Too bad for us Americans though, Levi Leipheimers gone, now Vande Velde is no longer the leader of Garmin, and Contador shows he is the leader of Astana.

-- orange52350

You can't blame Armstrong for seeking to win if he were indeed the best out there. Now that Contador showed how strong he really is, Armstrong is not going to have problems supporting him.


Comment »