Chris Paul's first trip to Los Angeles might have been canceled, but it looks like he'll be headed there after all with just a simple change of address for his destination arena. The Clippers and Hornets are closing in on a deal that would send Paul to Los Angeles with no third team involved -- just a straight-up trade of a superstar in his prime for some rebuilding parts. The haul the Hornets would receive seems fair, but would they have gotten a better deal from the Lakers?
Which would have been a fairer trade?
The Lakers would have given the Hornets Lamar Odom & Co., but the league intervened. Is this deal better?
Will the trade go through?
One Chris Paul trade has already fallen through. The potential inclusion of Eric Bledsoe could be a snag in this trade.
Better L.A. combo?
There's been talk of bringing Dwight Howard to the Lakers, but would a Howard-Bryant combo beat a Griffin-Paul duo?