When I read the news release that Dee Gordon had been named National League Rookie of the Month, I didn't get far before I realized that maybe he shouldn't have won the award. Not that I wasn't pleased for Gordon or happy with his performance, but the first player under "others receiving votes," Washington catcher Wilson Ramos, had a higher on-base percentage and slugging percentage. Now, Ramos didn't play as many games, and he didn't have Gordon's steals or his NL-high 42 hits, but it's not as if I can't see the case for the non-Dodger.
So when I see that Ryan Braun has been named NL Player of the Month for September, when Braun's on-base percentage, slugging percentage, OPS, RBI and runs created were lower than those of Matt Kemp (and other players), I feel I'm entitled to raise an eyebrow or three.
Note, by the way, that the confusing word "valuable" does not appear in the award.
It's funny – I don't really have my heart in this post (and I certainly don't have any anger), because I happen to think Braun is a great player. That division-clinching home run he hit, boosting Milwaukee to its first title since the 1980s, is something Brewer fans will cherish for a long, long time. I know this because I still cherish the division-clinching home run Steve Finley hit in 2004, boosting the Dodgers to their first title since the 1990s.
But every time I told myself not to bother with this post, there was something else that told me that it was worth noting that Matt Kemp had a better September than the NL Player of the Month for September. And so that's what I'm doing. (Also, I kind of liked the headline, whether or not it makes perfect sense.)