Orioles will attempt to do it all over again

SARASOTA, Fla. -- The memories of their 2012 magic show still float in the spring breeze. So it feels as if nothing is quite the same in the world of the Baltimore Orioles.

Uh, nothing, that is, except the names over the lockers, the names on the lineup card and the names on the roster sheets the team has been selling for a buck apiece all spring.

Well, most of those names, at least.

Remember that trip the Orioles made to baseball’s Octoberfest last year? It reignited a baseball love affair in their town, energized an entire franchise and even made it unsafe for Adam Jones to walk the streets of New Orleans.

Seriously. The ever-upbeat center fielder hit the bayou for a little Super Bowl action, “and I had people in New Orleans screaming my name down the street,” he laughed the other day. “And that never happened to me before, outside of Baltimore.”

So that should tell you something about how vastly the Orioles’ universe has changed. But there’s one thing their trip to October hasn't changed appreciably:

Their roster.

Ready? Here they come, this team’s only major-league roster acquisitions this winter from outside the organization:

Trayvon RobinsonDanny ValenciaAlexi CasillaRuss CanzlerLuis MartinezJair Jurrjens … and Rule 5 pick T.J. McFarland.

All fine fellows, with talents that can fit this operation. But haven’t been mistaken lately for Josh Hamilton, Zack Greinke or Torii Hunter.

Meanwhile, the only players who got significant playing time last year to hit the exit ramp? That would be Mark Reynolds and Robert Andino. And that’s it. So what you saw last September and October looks almost exactly like what you see now.

But is that a good thing or a bad thing? Depends on whom you ask.

“I didn’t understand their offseason,” one rival GM was saying recently. “They finally had a winning season, and free agents wouldn't run away from their money anymore. But they never went after any of those guys. I don’t get that one.”

And he wasn’t alone. But here’s what he and the many other second-guessers out there need to know: It was all by design. Or mostly by design, anyway.

For way too many years in the Peter Angelos era, the Orioles approached their offseasons by throwing money at whatever free agents were willing to take it. And how’d that work out for them? With 14 straight losing seasons. That’s how.

So what happened this winter was kind of the opposite. They didn't see their team as lucky, fluky or broken. So they didn't try to overhaul it, mess with it or fix it.

They saw no reason to spend money just to say they did. Or make a trade they didn't think made them better. Or fill up the transactions column just so somebody could say they “won” the offseason.

“We’re on the right track,” said their executive vice president for baseball operations, Dan Duquette.

“We stayed true to who we are and what we are and to our players,” said their deep-thinking manager, Buck Showalter. “We have a lot of trust in the guys we have. So our players look around and they know why [they didn’t sign, say, eight free agents].”

Now it wasn’t as if the Orioles didn’t at least window-shop in the free-agent market. They kicked the tires on Hamilton but found out fast that he was too pricey. They thought long and hard about Adam LaRoche but decided they weren’t interested in giving away a No. 1 pick for any free agent.

And it wasn't as if they didn't talk about a bunch of trades that would have involved dealing from their stockpile of young arms to get a bat. They were in on Justin Upton, but balked at including the best pitching prospect in baseball, Dylan Bundy. They talked to the Diamondbacks for weeks about Jason Kubel, but felt as if he wasn't a big enough upgrade.

I have a lot of faith and trust in these people. And I think they feed off that.

-- Showalter on his players

They actually explored numerous arm-for-bat deals, Duquette admitted. But in the end, he said, “we decided we were going to hold onto the young pitching.”

“Some of the bats that we could get would have improved our team,” he said. “But it wasn't a huge improvement. And we wanted to hold onto the pitching depth and see if we could utilize the pitching depth to have a competitive team. And we could always take a look at that [later].”

So in the end, after months of talking, they ended up doing None of the Above. But if the message they wanted to send to their clubhouse, by keeping the players they had, was that they believe in a group of men who won 93 games last year, then guess what?

Message received. Loud and clear.

“That’s a credit to the guys in this clubhouse, that the front office and management feel like they’ve already got a winning team,” said pitcher Jason Hammel. “They don’t need to go out and pluck from somebody else’s team to make us better. They’re going to add certain guys here and there to supply that depth. But we've got the makings of what we want to do, and the goals that we've set to try and achieve them, already here in place.”

You might have thought that after the magic carpet these men rode last summer, they would have gone home this winter and waited for their front office to drop at least one major bombshell on them. To sign a thumper like Hamilton or LaRoche. To trade one of their surplus arms for an Upton or even a Shin-Soo Choo.

But if they were all bummed out that nothing like that ever happened, you’d never know it to hear them talk this spring about how happy they are to see virtually all the same faces in all the same places.

“I don’t mind that we didn’t make any quote-unquote 'big' moves,” said reliever Darren O'Day. “I think we have a good offense. I think we have a great pitching staff. I love the team that we have here. If Babe Ruth was on the waiver wire, maybe we could make a trade. But I don’t think he is.

“This clubhouse has got confidence in management,” O'Day went on. “We all respect what they do. And we know that when they see something they like, they’ll pull the trigger to make this team better. I can tell you for a fact there’s no second-guessing in here.”

Which isn't the same thing as saying there’s no second-guessing in, say, Little Italy or Fell’s Point.

“The fans want you, obviously, to go sign this guy, go sign that guy,” said Jones. “Go after Greinke. Go after Josh Hamilton. People were blowing my Twitter up, saying, 'Would you move to left if they sign Michael Bourn?' 'Uhhh, nooo.' But people were saying, 'Go after him. Try and get Upton.' All that stuff. But just give me 25 guys who want to play the game, 25 selfless men that have one common goal, and I’ll be happy.

“And last year,” Jones chuckled, “we had 52 [of those selfless men]. We only had 25 at one time, but we had 52 who helped us succeed.”

Yeah, good point. The ever-changing Orioles of 2012 are a reminder that the players you see running around Ed Smith Field in February aren't guaranteed to be the same players who show up at Camden Yards in September.

Did you know that 32 of those 52 players this team used last season had never played for the Orioles before? Or that this outfit needed to rip through 178 roster moves just to get through the season? Or that Showalter wrote out 122 different lineups in 162 games and never used the same nine position players in as many as 10 games all season?

All true, ladies and gentlemen. But as Duquette loves to point out, the team they put on the field at the end of last season wasn't merely a lot different than they team they fielded early on.

It was also a lot better.

Over the final 56 games of last season, guess which team had the best record in baseball? That would be the Orioles (38-18). And not by accident.

They had the second-best run differential in the sport (plus-69) in that span. And they played dramatically better defense after they installed Manny Machado at third base and the now-departed Mark Reynolds at first.

So when the skeptics talk about what the Orioles didn't do over the offseason, Duquette likes to remind those folks about all the moves his team DID make during the season. So you can make a case -- and he’s happy to make it -- that the Orioles didn't have to do as much this winter as a lot of people seem to think.

“It was a good team at the end of the year,” he said. “It was a good defensive team. And it was a team that our fans connected with. They loved it. Work ethic. The determination of the team to compete in the close games and win the extra-inning games. And that’s kind of who we are. That’s kind of who the city is.”

But since he brought up all those close games, it’s time for this note of caution: History tells us it isn't wise for any team to assume it can duplicate a season in which it went 29-9 in one-run games, 54-23 in games decided by two runs or fewer, and 16-2 in extra-inning games (winning the last 16 of those in a row), as this team did. For instance:

• The 2012 Orioles had a .763 winning percentage in one-run games. The Elias Sports Bureau found nine other teams between 1950 and 2011 that won at least 70 percent of their one-run games. Their winning percentage in those games dropped by -- ready? -- 206 points (to .506) the next year.

• And the Orioles had an .888 winning percentage in extra innings last year. Elias found 24 teams from 1950-2011 that won at least 80 percent of their extra-inning games in a season. The following year, the winning percentage of those teams in those games fell by -- look out below -- 338 points (to .526).

So after perusing those figures, think the Orioles are a good bet to replicate either of those stats again? Even Duquette wouldn't wager on that happening.

“I would concede that,” he said. “But I would also say that we won a lot of those one-run games and two-run games and extra-inning games when we had a lesser team. I think we had a better team at the end of the year than we had at the start of the year.”

OK, we won’t argue that. But those wins all counted. And Elias also found this:

The overall winning percentage of those nine teams from 1950-2011 that won 70 percent of their one-run games dropped by 56 points the next season. In other words, those teams won about nine fewer games than they’d won the year before.

In other words, while it isn't safe to conclude the Orioles can’t win again in 2013, it’s an excellent bet that they can’t win THAT way again.

But if that’s the deal, it’s OK with them.

Just suppose, Showalter muses, they can keep Nick Markakis healthy all year. And Brian Roberts. (So far, so good on that front, incidentally.) And Nolan Reimold. And Hammel. Every one of those men missed at least a third of the season last year with injuries.

Now start mulling what a full season of Manny Machado might give them. Or what the potential impact of Bundy or last year’s No. 1 pick, Kevin Gausman, might mean to this rotation at some point this summer.

“I have a lot of faith and trust in these people,” the manager said. “And I think they feed off that.”

So feel free to doubt them. There’s nothing these Baltimore Orioles seem to enjoy more. Those doubts helped drive them to one trip to October last year. They’d be happy to make it two this year, no matter what the skeptics think.

“You know, I've always said, if you do it once, you’re lucky,” said O'Day. “And if you do it a couple of times, you’re pretty darned good.”