Editor's note: The following is an excerpt from Ivan Maisel's new book "The Maisel Report: College Football's Most Overrated and Underrated Players, Coaches, Teams, & Traditions."
As a native of Alabama who has lived in California, Texas, and now New
England, I've got a pretty good grip on regional biases.
They have in common the trait of ignorance. People dismiss what they don't know.
But as someone who has covered college football for more than 20 years,
and as someone who has covered Alabama-Auburn, Ohio State-Michigan,
Texas-Oklahoma, USC-Notre Dame, Florida-Georgia, etc., etc., I want to
preempt criticism of what I am about to say. I might be wrong, but it's not
The USC-UCLA rivalry is the most overrated in college football. There
is a rivalry. There is some emotion. There is some dislike.
But, c'mon. It's in L.A.
There are the sellout crowds at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum and
the Rose Bowl. There's the delight the Bruins took in ending the Trojans'
national championship hopes in 2006 with a 13-9 upset. There's the 1967
game, in which the No. 4 Trojans and their Heisman Trophy candidate, tailback O.J. Simpson, defeated the No. 1 Bruins and their Heisman Trophy
winner, quarterback Gary Beban, 21–20. The game turned on Simpson's
64-yard, gravity-defying touchdown sprint in the fourth quarter. Dan
Jenkins, the best college football writer since Grantland Rice, has that '67
game on his short list of all-time greats.
But, c'mon. It's still in L.A.
These people don't know how to hate a
college football opponent. The weather's too nice. There's too much else to
do. College football is just not important enough.
The lifeblood of a college rivalry is the identity that alumni and fans
invest in their school. It is oxygen. It is all there is. UCLA may have lost eight
of the last nine to USC by an average of 21 points, but the typical Bruin
doesn't feel a sliver of the angst that has taken up residence in the gut of every
Alabama fan. The Crimson Tide faithful awaken every day knowing that
they have to go into the office and face Auburn fans who will let them
know -- every day -- that the Tigers have won six straight Iron Bowls.
The laidback attitude of most Californians makes for a lukewarm rivalry between USC
College football does not do well in urban markets, largely because of the
arrival over the last 50 years of NFL fever. Los Angeles is an exception
because there's no NFL team, and because USC and UCLA have healthy fan
bases. But L.A. college fans don't have the same allegiance to these two
schools that college fans around the country have. L.A. people are more than
their school. When their teams lose, they don't riot. They just don't show up.
USC and UCLA fans say that they work together uneasily. They say that
marriages between alums of the two schools are "mixed." But you could
generate a healthy debate regarding whether UCLA is even USC's biggest
rival. The Trojan players, and probably the fans, may tell you that they
would rather beat the Bruins than anyone else. They do have to live there.
The rest of the country pays more attention to USC–Notre Dame (which,
by the way, began in 1926, three years before the USC-UCLA rivalry).
If there is any doubt about the identity of your biggest rival, then by def-
inition your rivalry is overrated. The only place that doubt is allowed in any
rivalry regards the outcome. UCLA and USC are lacking here, too. UCLA's
2006 upset of USC prevented the Trojans from playing for No. 1. But one
of the reasons that the upset made the Earth move is that it was so, so unex-
pected. When one team consistently loses to the other by an average of three
touchdowns, that's not a rivalry.
Bruin fans may counter that the rivalry's heartbeat has slowed, not
stopped -- UCLA trails USC 42–28–7 in the all-time series. In their defense,
the rivalry does possess one of the trademarks of any great rivalry: pranks.
Bruin fans traditionally defaced the Tommy Trojan statue on the USC campus
until the arrival of the Trojan Knights, 24-hour volunteer guards during the
week of the game, who annually encase bronzed Tommy in -- we kid you
not -- duct tape. This may be a case of the cure being worse than the illness.
The rivalry's trophy, the Victory Bell, once belonged to UCLA. USC frat
boys stole the bell and hid it, and after the administrations of the schools
negotiated, they agreed that the winner would keep it for the following year.
The team that wins the Victory Bell paints it the appropriate color: UCLA's
"true blue" or USC's cardinal.
Not bad, although trophies themselves, while fun, aren't necessary.
Many of the top rivalries don't play for trophies, and if they do, the most
ardent fans couldn't tell you what they are. In most top rivalries, the trophy
is the scalp of the losing coach. There is a hint of that in UCLA-USC. Karl
Dorrell went 1–4 against USC and 34–23 against the rest of the competi-
tion. UCLA fired him. John Robinson, in his USC sequel, went 0–5 against
UCLA, but neither athletic director Mike Garrett nor Robinson listed that
among the reasons he was fired.
Ask Texas coach Mack Brown about winning 10 games and being casti-
gated for not beating Oklahoma. Not until the national championship
season of 2005, when junior quarterback Vince Young had matured and the
Sooners were rebuilding, did a 45–12 Longhorns victory calm the faithful.
It is entirely possible that new Bruins coach Rick Neuheisel will do a Dr.
Frankenstein on the USC-UCLA rivalry and make it compelling again. It
is entirely possible that USC coach Pete Carroll will get bored with domi-
nating the Pac-10 and begin his third attempt to climb the NFL mountain.
I think Carroll is smarter than that and would rather continue being the
King of Los Angeles. But never discount the power of ego among head
coaches. Until one of those things happens, until this rivalry becomes com-
petitive, and until the schools move it to a smaller place where it will
consume every molecule of air for the week leading up to the game, you're
going to have to find me a better rivalry than this one.
Ivan Maisel is a senior writer for ESPN.com. Send your questions and comments to Ivan at email@example.com. His new book, "The Maisel Report: College Football's Most Overrated and Underrated Players, Coaches, Teams, & Traditions," is on sale now. For more information, go to TheMaiselReport.com.