ESPN

Greatest. (Hypothetical) Series. Ever.

Start the countdown to the Western Conference finals, when we (fingers crossed!) get to watch two historically great squads square off -- maybe even seven times in a row (toes crossed!).

BPI prediction

We employed ESPN's NBA Basketball Power Index (BPI) to pick the winner of a Spurs-Warriors series. BPI is a measure of team strength developed by the ESPN Analytics team, and takes into account game-by-game efficiency, strength of schedule, pace, days of rest, game location and preseason expectations. Who would prevail in a playoff showdown? BPI gives San Antonio the edge, but not by much.

BPI prediction

49%

51%

SPURS

ESPN'S NBA BASKETBALL POWER INDEX PREDICTION

WARRIORS


Slow and steady downs the Dubs

Golden State is the best team in the NBA when playing fast (100 possessions per game or more) and is tops by a wide margin at a normal pace of play (95-100). But the Spurs are no slouches, and they're significantly better when the game grinds to a low gear. If the Spurs slow the pace (as they did in a March 19 win), they could gain the edge.

Net efficiency by pace
  • Warriors

  • Spurs

+20

+18.8

+13.5

+15

+14.0

+12.8

+11.6

+10.3

+10

+9.3

+5

+2.9

0

(t-10th)

(2nd)

(1st)

(1st)

(1st)

(2nd)

(1st)

(2nd)

OVERALL

<95 POSS.

95-100 POSS.

>100 POSS.


Four Factors vs. First Five

The Spurs shine in analytics pioneer Dean Oliver's four key defensive metrics, while the Warriors have four of the league's 15 most efficient lineups. The numbers add up: The Spurs' 96.1 DRtg is No. 1, as is the Warriors' 112.5 ORtg via NBA.com's team stats.

Defensive Four Factors
NBA ranks in defensive metrics
  • Warriors

  • Spurs

1

1

3

3

2

8

10

16

17

20

20

30

EFFECTIVE FG%

TO%

D-REB

FT/FGA

47.5

VS.

48

14.1

VS.

12.7

79.3%

VS.

76.1%

0.181

VS.

0.210

Formula for efficiency
NBA'S BEST LINEUPS BY NET EFFICIENCY

Curry/Thompson/Barnes/Iguodala/Green (GS)

+48.8

Curry/Thompson/Bogut/Iguodala/Green (GS)

+32.2

Curry/Thompson/Ezeli/Iguodala/Green (GS)

+26.5

James/Love/Dellavedova/Thompson/Smith (Cle)

+23.9

Bradley/Jerebko/Olynyk/Smart/Turner (Bos)

+20.9

Hardaway/Horford/Schroder/Scott/Sefolosha (Atl)

+20.3

Crawford/Johnson/Jordan/Paul/Redick (LAC)

+20.0

Griffin/Jordan/Paul/Redick/Stephenson (LAC)

+19.9

Griffin/Jordan/Mbah a Moute/Paul/Redick (LAC)

+18.8

Lowry/Joseph/DeRozan/Patterson/Biyombo (TOR)

+18.4

Johnson/Jordan/Mbah a Moute/Paul/Redick (LAC)

+18.3

Adams/Durant/Ibaka/Roberson/Westbrook (OKC)

+16.7

Curry/Thompson/Bogut/Rush/Green (GS)

+16.6

Lowry/Joseph/Ross/Patterson/Biyombo (TOR)

+16.4

Aldridge/Duncan/Ginobili/Leonard/Parker (SA)

+15.6


Defense wins championships ... unless offense does

In the 10 postseason matchups of the NBA's best offense vs. best defense since 1970-71 (four of which came in the conference finals), the sharpest shooters have won seven times. One of three defenses to buck the trend? The 2004-05 Spurs.

Matchups of NBA's top squads by efficiency
  • Winner

Best offense
Season
Best defense
LA Lakers
1971-72
Milwaukee
Milwaukee
1973-74
Chicago
Golden State
1974-75
Washington
LA Lakers
1979-80
Philadelphia
Detroit
1983-84
New York
LA Lakers
1989-90
Houston
Chicago
1996-97
Miami
Indiana
1999-2000
LA Lakers
Phoenix
2004-05
San Antonio
Dallas
2005-06
San Antonio

More Stories