![]() | |
![]() |
| Wednesday, August 29 Ty Cobb must be rolling in his grave By Jim Caple ESPN.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
And now, courtesy of Seattle reliever Arthur Rhodes, we bring you a sentence never before uttered by an athlete questioning his opponent's manhood. "I'm not going to let a guy weighing 125 pounds tell me that I have to take out my earring."
Kind of hard to imagine those words coming out of Ty Cobb's mouth, isn't it? Rhodes, however, spoke them over the weekend after he became the first player ever ejected for over-accessorizing. He was about to enter Saturday's Seattle-Cleveland game in relief when Cleveland batter Omar Vizquel complained about the glare from Rhodes' diamond earrings, which are about the size of twin snow cones. Vizquel said the glare was distracting and asked umpires to make the pitcher remove the earrings. Rhodes took offense, one thing led to another and the fashion police gave him the thumb for a major Glamour Don't. The Mariners brought in Rhodes the next day and the umpires again told him to remove his earrings. He grudgingly did so, then blew a 3-2 lead when Kenny Lofton drove a tough pitch into center field for a two-run single. The entire episode provokes all sorts of fashion issues. If the glare from Rhodes' studs was too much for Vizquel, how does he ever manage when Rickey Henderson is in the field? Is two months' salary too much to spend on a reliever's diamond studs? And just how many carats are considered appropriate for a day game? It also sets the stage for some very bad blood between Seattle and Cleveland should the two teams meet in the postseason. Already, manager Lou Piniella was on the radio and accused Cleveland's Charlie Manuel of wearing brown shoes with a blue suit. Actually I'm surprised it took so long for such a conflict to arise given that players have been wearing earrings for about a decade. The one occasionally dangling from Barry Bonds' ear is large enough to double as a fishing lure for a Great White Shark and Florida's A.J. Burnett has two nipple rings. Whether to wear earrings (or nipple rings) is not so much a matter of the rules but of baseball fashion, which goes in and out of style nearly as often as Madonna's wardrobe. Earrings or no earrings, flannel or polyester, button-down or pullover -- it's all a question of what's in at the moment. Consider stirrup socks. Just as hem lines constantly rise and fall in women's fashion, no part of the uniform changes fashion more often than the stirrup socks. Long ago, players wore stirrup socks that showed almost no white underneath, pulling their dark exterior socks up nearly to their knees. Then in the late '60s and '70s it became fashionable to have a long, thin stirrup that rose well over the calf. That style got to the point where Oakland did away with the stirrup sock entirely and merely painted a green stripe down their sanitary socks to give the appearance of stirrups. Scott Erickson sparked a minor trend in the early '90s when began wearing his stirrup socks down low so that no white showed. Now most players wear their pants with the cuffs bunched up over their socks, as if Pedro Martinez accidentally put on Randy Johnson's pants. I've never gotten used to that look but it doesn't matter. Nor should it matter to the fans who are disgusted by the earrings Rhodes and so many other players wear. Eventually, everything considered in vogue now will fall from favor. Unfortunately, that's also true of every past style we ever hated. No matter how ugly we may consider it now, at some point baseball will bring everything back into fashion. Well, on second thought, maybe not Randy Johnson's haircut.
Box score line of the week But this week's award goes to Rhodes for his role in the longest, strangest at-bat of the season last Saturday. He took over after reliever Kazu Sasaki threw one pitch to Vizquel and then left the game due to a sore thigh. That sparked the great Diamond Debate and led to Rhodes' ejection before he even threw a single pitch. Which brought in John Halama, the second emergency reliever of the at-bat, who finally retired Vizquel on a popup. All told, the at-bat took about 15 minutes and three pitchers and led to this very unusual line for Rhodes: 0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 0 K, 0 pitches And, of course, no earrings.
Lies, damn lies and statistics
From left field Here are the eight players who played in the Little League World Series and the real World Series:
Win Blake Stein's money Q. Who is the only player to play in the Little League World Series, the College World Series and the World Series?
Power rankings
A. Ed Vosberg, who went to the LLWS with a Tucson team, the CWS with the University of Arizona and the World Series with Florida in 1997.
Jim Caple is a Senior Writer for ESPN.com. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||