![]() |
| Tuesday, February 11 Updated: March 14, 4:48 PM ET Get ready for another year of endless Expos questions By Sean McAdam Special to ESPN.com |
|||||||||||||
|
With more than a degree of pride, commissioner Bud Selig likes to remind one and all that baseball hasn't had a franchise shift in better than 30 years, a measure of its relative stability when stacked against other pro leagues. Relocations have been commonplace in both the NBA and NHL. Even the mighty NFL, absent the protection provided by an anti-trust exemption, wasn't powerful enough to stop the moving vans from taking teams to Indianapolis, Nashville, Phoenix and St. Louis. But it's time for baseball to relent and allow the Montreal Expos to be sold and move. Somewhere. Anywhere, but Montreal.
The Expos have been in Montreal since 1969 and except for a few seasons in the 1980s and the "what-might-have-been'' campaign of 1994 have been unable to make their mark there. As the gap grew between the haves and have-nots in the last decade, no franchise better symbolized the futility of small-market franchises than Les Expos: They routinely developed young talent, and just as routinely, eventually saw it get away, a victim of the game's two-tiered economic structure. Fan support, which has been almost non-existent in recent years, is almost incidental in the big picture; the Expos can't find an owner willing to keep the team in Montreal. Following a complicated franchise swap, MLB took control of the franchise before last season, inviting inevitable problems. No matter what the Expos did, they -- or more precisely, the remaining 29 owners -- opened themselves to charges of conflict of interest.
Conspiracy theorists will continue to find evidence that the Expos are, by definition, operating under a different set of rules than the other 29 franchises. In an effort to broaden baseball's base and, let's face it, limit the number of times the Expos have to play before crowds of less than 8,000, Major League Baseball has scheduled 22 of their games in Puerto Rico. This, too, is patently unfair. While every other club has to play 81 games on the road, the Expos have to play 103. And what about their divisional opponents like the Mets and Phillies, who, instead of making a quick flight from the Northeast corridor to Quebec, must re-route themselves to the Caribbean? By all accounts, baseball is moving slowly in the sale process. A certain amount of caution is necessary. If you think otherwise, just look at the NHL, which, on commissioner Gary Bettman's watch, has seen two different owners taken away in handcuffs. The last thing baseball needs are over-leveraged owners or underfunded stadium projects. And, to be sure, there are potential problems with the two prime relocation choices. The Washington, D.C.-Northern Virginia area may be ready for its third try at a team, but is Major League Baseball ready for the resulting fallout from Baltimore Orioles owner and uber-litigator Peter Angelos? Angelos is primed to sue baseball for encroaching on his territory. Meanwhile, Portland's economy is in a shambles, calling into question, at least for now, the wisdom of placing a second team in the Pacific Northwest. But clearly, baseball needs to proceed with some urgency since there are more potential problems on the near horizon. As the season progresses, superstar outfielder Vladimir Guerrero, inarguably one of the half-dozen best players in the game, will be creeping toward free agency. Do the Expos deal Guerrero at the July 31 trading deadline, knowing that they can't possibly afford to retain him? Or, do they keep him, thus making the team more attractive to a deep-pocketed owner. For that matter, for whom does Minaya work? For the fans -- however few there may be -- of the long-suffering Expos? For Selig? For some unidentified owner, waiting in the wings? Does Minaya try to win this year? Does he have a long-term plan in place? There are too many questions as the Expos prepare to kick off their second season as wards of the state. It isn't so bad that they're still in Montreal; it's the fact they're still in limbo. Sean McAdam of the Providence Journal covers baseball for ESPN.com. |
| ||||||||||||