MLB
Scores
Schedule
Pitching Probables
Standings
Statistics
Players
Transactions
Injuries: AL | NL
Minor Leagues
MLB en espanol
Message Board
CLUBHOUSE


FEATURES
Playoff Schedule
News Wire
Daily Glance
Power Alley
History
MLB Insider


THE ROSTER
Jim Caple
Peter Gammons
Rob Neyer
John Sickels
Jayson Stark
ESPN MALL
TeamStore
ESPN Auctions
SPORT SECTIONS
Tuesday, February 11
Updated: March 14, 4:48 PM ET
 
Get ready for another year of endless Expos questions

By Sean McAdam
Special to ESPN.com

With more than a degree of pride, commissioner Bud Selig likes to remind one and all that baseball hasn't had a franchise shift in better than 30 years, a measure of its relative stability when stacked against other pro leagues.

Relocations have been commonplace in both the NBA and NHL. Even the mighty NFL, absent the protection provided by an anti-trust exemption, wasn't powerful enough to stop the moving vans from taking teams to Indianapolis, Nashville, Phoenix and St. Louis.

But it's time for baseball to relent and allow the Montreal Expos to be sold and move. Somewhere. Anywhere, but Montreal.

Vladimir Guerrero
Vladimir Guerrero batted .330 or better in three of the last four seasons.

The Expos have been in Montreal since 1969 and except for a few seasons in the 1980s and the "what-might-have-been'' campaign of 1994 have been unable to make their mark there.

As the gap grew between the haves and have-nots in the last decade, no franchise better symbolized the futility of small-market franchises than Les Expos: They routinely developed young talent, and just as routinely, eventually saw it get away, a victim of the game's two-tiered economic structure.

Fan support, which has been almost non-existent in recent years, is almost incidental in the big picture; the Expos can't find an owner willing to keep the team in Montreal.

Following a complicated franchise swap, MLB took control of the franchise before last season, inviting inevitable problems. No matter what the Expos did, they -- or more precisely, the remaining 29 owners -- opened themselves to charges of conflict of interest.

  • When the Expos and GM Omar Minaya skillfully outmaneuvered other clubs for pitcher Bartolo Colon, there were cries that MLB had orchestrated the deal to help the Expos win and thus, inflate the value of the franchise. More value meant more money for everyone else when the sale was completed.

  • When the Expos dealt Cliff Floyd to the Red Sox -- despite the best effort by the New York Yankees -- George Steinbrenner stage-whispered that MLB had steered Floyd to the Sox as a favor to Red Sox owners John Henry and Larry Lucchino, who had been united by Selig.

  • When Minaya was ordered to cut payroll -- and thus auction off one of his two prized starting pitchers -- it was theorized that he was also told to drag his feet so as to forestall big-spending teams from overspending on other pitching free agents.

    Conspiracy theorists will continue to find evidence that the Expos are, by definition, operating under a different set of rules than the other 29 franchises.

    In an effort to broaden baseball's base and, let's face it, limit the number of times the Expos have to play before crowds of less than 8,000, Major League Baseball has scheduled 22 of their games in Puerto Rico. This, too, is patently unfair.

    While every other club has to play 81 games on the road, the Expos have to play 103. And what about their divisional opponents like the Mets and Phillies, who, instead of making a quick flight from the Northeast corridor to Quebec, must re-route themselves to the Caribbean?

    By all accounts, baseball is moving slowly in the sale process. A certain amount of caution is necessary. If you think otherwise, just look at the NHL, which, on commissioner Gary Bettman's watch, has seen two different owners taken away in handcuffs. The last thing baseball needs are over-leveraged owners or underfunded stadium projects.

    And, to be sure, there are potential problems with the two prime relocation choices. The Washington, D.C.-Northern Virginia area may be ready for its third try at a team, but is Major League Baseball ready for the resulting fallout from Baltimore Orioles owner and uber-litigator Peter Angelos? Angelos is primed to sue baseball for encroaching on his territory.

    Meanwhile, Portland's economy is in a shambles, calling into question, at least for now, the wisdom of placing a second team in the Pacific Northwest.

    But clearly, baseball needs to proceed with some urgency since there are more potential problems on the near horizon. As the season progresses, superstar outfielder Vladimir Guerrero, inarguably one of the half-dozen best players in the game, will be creeping toward free agency.

    Do the Expos deal Guerrero at the July 31 trading deadline, knowing that they can't possibly afford to retain him? Or, do they keep him, thus making the team more attractive to a deep-pocketed owner.

    For that matter, for whom does Minaya work? For the fans -- however few there may be -- of the long-suffering Expos? For Selig? For some unidentified owner, waiting in the wings?

    Does Minaya try to win this year? Does he have a long-term plan in place?

    There are too many questions as the Expos prepare to kick off their second season as wards of the state. It isn't so bad that they're still in Montreal; it's the fact they're still in limbo.

    Sean McAdam of the Providence Journal covers baseball for ESPN.com.





  •  More from ESPN...
    Hot Stove Heaters: Expos
    Led by hard-nosed manager ...

    Sean McAdam Archive



     ESPN Tools
    Email story
     
    Most sent
     
    Print story
     
    Daily email