![]() | |
![]() |
| Wednesday, February 13 San Francisco Giants By Matt Szefc ESPN.com |
||||||||||||||||||
2001 in review
What went wrong?
In retrospect, the critical decisions were: 2. Going into the season with the tandem of Russ Davis and Feliz manning the hot corner. Davis played in just 53 games before getting released. Feliz never became a regular and showed little when given an opportunity to play. 3. Not re-signing Ellis Burks. While Burks was overpaid by the Indians (a three-year, $20 million deal), the Giants definitely missed his bat in the lineup. Armando Rios, John Vander Wal, Shawon Dunston and Eric Davis all took their turns in right field, but never provided the consistent production that is sorely needed out of a middle-of-the-lineup hitter.
Looking ahead to 2002 2. Will a full season having Schmidt in the starting rotation be a big boost to the staff? 3. Will Benito Santiago, who will turn 37 on March 9, be able to catch close to the 133 games he did last season? The Giants hope he doesn't have to (he slowed down in the second half of last season, hitting just .237 after the All-Star break), but are unsure 25-year-old second-year man Edwards Guzman will be able to handle more playing time. The Giants are also high on rookie Yorvit Torrealba, who will be given a chance to win the backup job in spring training.
Can expect to play better
Can expect to play worse
Projected lineup
Rotation
Closer
A closer look That deal could turn out to be a steal for the Giants, even as Bonds turns past 40 during the contract. Why such a great deal for San Francisco? While the contract does make Bonds the fourth-highest paid player in terms of average annual value ($18 million per season), the fifth year of the deal (2006, when Bonds will be 41) isn't guaranteed unless Bonds has 500 or more plate appearances in the prior season (2005). Thus, unless Bonds meets incentives he's only guaranteed $72 million over four years (and the $72 million isn't paid over just the next four seasons as there are deferred payments written into the contract). But if Bonds does have 500 or more plate appearances in 2005 it very likely means he will still be a productive player who might just be closing in on -- if not already broken -- Hank Aaron's all-time home run record. Bonds currently has 567 career home runs, 188 shy of Aaron's record of 755. He needs to average just under 38 home runs over the next five years to break Aaron's record. And while it's crazy to think Bonds will put together another season like he did last year, it's not crazy -- barring an unforeseen injury or injuries -- to think he'll be able to put on a heck of a run over the next five years in an attempt to become baseball's all-time home run king. The Giants for some time now have claimed to be a club that can only exist on a mid-market budget ($60-$70 million payroll range). While the money they will pay Bonds over the next four years or five years is on the high end of player salaries at the present time, the structure of the contract shouldn't prevent the Giants from remaining a competitive team by surrounding Bonds with other top talent. And this offseason was a perfect example of that as along with re-signing Bonds, the Giants also re-signed pitcher Jason Schmidt (four years, $30 million) and signed outfielder Reggie Sanders (one year, $2.25 million). So, kudos to Giants owner Peter Magowan and Co. for keeping Bonds in the fold for what should be the remainder of his career. While Bonds' contract isn't chump change, it will be an afterthought if Bonds comes close to duplicating his 2001 numbers in the coming years. And just think if home run No. 756 comes while Bonds is wearing a Giants uniform: you better believe Magowan and Co. will also cash in from all the attention. Matt Szefc is the assistant baseball editor at ESPN.com. |
|
|||||||||||||||||