![]() | |
![]() |
| Wednesday, February 5 Updated: March 13, 12:27 PM ET Texas Rangers By Rob Neyer ESPN.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2002 in review
What went wrong?
In retrospect, the critical decisions were: 2. Signing Juan Gonzalez. Everybody points to the contracts of Park and Rodriguez, but what about Gonzalez? Prior to last season, the Rangers gave Gonzalez $24 million for two years -- granted, some of the money was deferred -- and then he spent more than half the season on the disabled list while suffering from various injuries. 3. Giving Michael Young another shot at second base. He didn't play well as a rookie in 2001, but he'd been decent in the minors so the Rangers sent him out there for 156 games in 2002. He responded with excellent defense but reached base barely 30 percent of the time. And now the Rangers are supposedly toying with the idea of shifting third baseman Hank Blalock to second, a la Jeff Kent.
Looking ahead to 2003 2. Who's going to pick up the slack? With Ivan Rodriguez gone and Kenny Rogers testing the free-agent waters, the Rangers have lost one of their best hitters and might lose their best pitcher. With no obvious replacements on hand, the Rangers need somebody to step up.
3. Who's in first? We've penciled Kevin Mench into the leadoff slot, but he's nobody's idea of a leadoff hitter, and the Rangers reportedly have interest in signing Kenny Lofton or perhaps even 44-year-old Rickey Henderson. The problem with this plan is that acquiring one of the available leadoff men would push a more productive hitter -- Herbert Perry or Hank Blalock, for example -- to the bench.
Can expect to play better Park will "earn" $13 million in 2003 and is at least a decent bet to top the nine victories of last year, especially if he can avoid the hamstring and blister problems that contributed to his poor performance in 2002. Gonzalez is likely to play more than 70 games this time around.
Can expect to play worse
Projected lineup
Rotation
Closer
A closer look
Payroll Rk Wins Rk
Rangers $260 1 216 4
Mariners $235 2 300 1
Angels $175 3 256 3
Athletics $120 4 296 2
From 2000 through 2002, the West grabbed six postseason berths, the maximum possible: three division titles, along with all three wild-card slots. The A's have reached postseason play all three years, the Mariners made it in 2000 and 2001, and of course the Angels went all the way in 2002. Everybody's made it ... except the team that spent the most money. Also striking is the Rangers' absolute lack of progress. In 2000, they won 71 games. In 2001, they won 73. And in 2002, they won 72. There have been few teams in the history of the game to spend so much money (relative to their opponents) with so little (positive) effect. But will it soon be the Texans' turn? At this moment, the Rangers boast the game's No. 1 minor-league prospect, third baseman Mark Teixeira. He's slated to open the season in Triple-A, but he's also expected to reach the majors sometime in 2003, and the switch-hitter should annually bat .300 and hit 40 homers once he's got his sea legs. In addition, Hank Blalock, though he didn't play well as a rookie in 2002, is still only 22 and figures to become a star in the not-so-distant future. That would give the Rangers two outstanding young hitters at positions -- first base, third base, DH -- where you want outstanding hitters if you hope to score enough runs to compete. But of course, the Rangers have been scoring enough runs to compete. The problem is preventing enough runs to compete. And the Rangers still have a fair piece to travel in that area. A year ago, they figured they could spend their way out of that problem, signing Chan Ho Park to a five-year, $65 million contract. That move might pay off down the road, but after one season it must be considered a disaster, as Park has always found the going tough when away from Dodger Stadium. Kenny Rogers was the Rangers' best pitcher in 2002, and he might not re-sign with the Rangers for 2003. The Rangers have two excellent pitching prospects in Colby Lewis and Ben Kozlowski, but neither is a sure thing and the club will be fortunate if even one of them eventually becomes a league-average starting pitcher. If Rogers returns and if Park shaves a run from his ERA and if Lewis or Kozlowski develops real, real fast ... if all those things happen in 2003 or 2004, the Rangers have a pretty decent shot of taking third place, or perhaps even second (if the Mariners' age shows and the Angels' wings melt) all for themselves. But a postseason appearance? Unless George Steinbrenner swaps teams with Tom Hicks, the Rangers are a few years away. They play in the game's toughest division, and Hicks is no longer interested in trying to spend enough money to get better in a hurry. Buck Showalter is a great manager, but he's not a miracle worker. Senior writer Rob Neyer, whose Big Book of Baseball Lineups will be published in April by Fireside, appears here regularly during the season and irregularly in the offseason. His e-mail address is rob.neyer@dig.com. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||