![]() | |
![]() |
| Thursday, January 23 Updated: March 13, 4:37 PM ET Chicago White Sox By John Sickels Special to ESPN.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2002 in review
What went wrong?
In retrospect, the critical decisions were:
2. Pulling the plug. When it became obvious that the season wasn't going well, the Sox dumped veterans Sandy Alomar, Kenny Lofton, Bobby Howry, and Ray Durham in trades, bringing in additional talent for the farm system. The concurrent decision to use youngsters like Crede, Aaron Rowand, and Willie Harris in the everyday lineup gave them needed experience, and in Crede's case proved once and for all that he was ready for a major league job. 3. Bringing prospect Jon Rauch north from spring training. One of their best prospects, Rauch missed most of '01 recovering from a shoulder injury. He hadn't pitched especially well in spring training, but had done enough to impress the coaches. GM Ken Williams was talked into putting Rauch in the rotation, but he was hit hard, then sent back to the minor leagues. This stalled his development, left a hole in the rotation, and raised questions about the decision-making process in the front office.
Looking ahead to 2003 2. Is Miguel Olivo ready to catch in the major leagues? If he isn't, how much does Sandy Alomar have left? 3. Up the middle. The Sox have several parts they can use at shortstop, second base, and center field. Jose Valentin, D'Angelo Jimenez, and Willie Harris will vie for playing time up the middle, with Rowand pencilled in center field to start the year. Harris can also play outfield. Having multiple options is good, but can also lead to defensive chaos, excessive mixing and matching, and clubhouse problems if the decision-making process is confused or unclear to the players.
Can expect to play better
Can expect to play worse
Projected lineup
Rotation
Closer
A closer look But while it is possible, it's hardly certain that these trades will improve the team. In fact, there is a decent chance that these transactions could backfire, probably a bigger chance than the Sox realize. First, the bullpen. Does switching Koch and Keith Foulke improve the team?
Why, exactly, do the White Sox think that Koch is a better pitcher than Foulke? In 2002, Foulke had a better ERA and a better WHIP. He lost his closer job after blowing some early saves, but that seemed a clear case of scapegoating. Foulke saved 66 games in '00 and '01, blowing just eight chances. Dumping him as the closer after a bad couple of weeks was a ridiculous move. On a career basis, Foulke again outdoes Koch in ERA, WHIP, and control, and his save conversion rate is within variation of Koch's. The only thing that Koch has that Foulke doesn't is a blazing fastball and a reputation. But in the big picture, it isn't blazing fastballs that make closers. Just like anything else, it's pitching ability. Koch is a good closer because he is a good pitcher. But Foulke is also a good pitcher, and he's a good closer, too. And, by the measures above, he's a better pitcher than Koch is. Adding Koch to the mix does not improve the bullpen; it merely makes it more expensive. If Koch's command unravels, Foulke could end up outpitching him by a significant margin. Either way, adding Koch is unlikely to actually improve the team. At best, it's running in place. Colon, on the other hand, does improve the team, especially considering that the man he replaces in the rotation is Ritchie. Colon set a career-best ERA at 2.95 last year, while winning 20 games for the Indians and Expos, hardly super-strong teams. But as several writers have noticed, Colon's strikeout rate took a sharp drop downward. He fanned 149 in 233 innings, compared to 201/222 in '01, 212/188 in '00, and 161/205 in '99. There are two ways to spin this. The optimists say that this is a sign of maturity on Colon's part, that he's not trying to strike out every hitter anymore, and is willing to let his defense do some of the work for him. The optimists point out that Colon's walk rate dropped, too, and his overall performance was certainly better, as shown by his ERA. The pessimists, on the other hand, say that dropping K/IP rates are the first sign of a declining pitcher, even if it takes the rest of his numbers a year or two to catch up. They point out Colon's heavy workload over the last few years, as well as his tendency to carry too much weight, as additional warning signs for the future. So, which way do we go? Does Colon collapse in '03, or does he keep pitching like an ace? On this question hang the White Sox's hopes for '03. If he pitches the way he did last year, he'll be such a huge improvement over Ritchie that he could very well carry the Sox past 90 wins, assuming of course that the other pitchers carry their weight. If Colon gets hurt or falls apart dramatically, then the trade will go down as the second great bust on GM Ken Williams' resume. If Colon splits the difference and returns to pre-2002 performance levels, very good but not Cy Young material, then he'll still push the Sox closer to catching the Twins, but won't put them over the top alone. That's our bet here. Expect Colon to regress to performance around his career norms, an ERA in the 3.70 range, 14-18 wins if he gets run support. Colon will help, and the Sox could very well win, but he can't do it by himself. The other players will have to come through, too. John Sickels is the author of the 2002 Minor League Scouting Notebook, and is now working on the 2003 Baseball Prospect Book. His biography of Bob Feller will be published next spring. He lives in Lawrence, Kansas, with his wife, son, and two cats. You can send John questions or comments at JASickels@aol.com, or you can visit his homepage at JohnSickels.com. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||