How realistic is Bryce Harper's 2020 MLB season plan? We break down his ideas

Bryce Harper appreciates Blake Snell 'speaking the truth' (0:25)

Bryce Harper reacts to Blake Snell not wanting to play for a reduced salary and is glad Snell stepped up and said it. (0:25)

How eager are we for baseball? More than a little -- heck, a lot. And now that we're witnessing the industry tiptoe toward a plan for reinitiating the 2020 campaign for Major League Baseball, we can't help speculating what a baseball season will look like. Last night, Bryce Harper got into the act, floating his own sketch for a 135-game regular season on Instagram:

View this post on Instagram

Baseball Season:⠀ Beyond the health and safety which comes first for all players, staff, workers, fans, and families. ⠀ ⠀ Just an idea I have been thinking about. ⠀ ⠀ East/West like NBA. ⠀ ⠀ July 31 days⠀ August 31 days ⠀ September 30 days ⠀ October 31 days ⠀ November 15 days ⠀ 135 games. ⠀ Off day every 2 weeks on a Monday and Sunday double header 7 innings. ⠀ ⠀ 30 players. 6 man rotation. Save arms. IF pitchers wanted this. If not no big deal. DH and any other ideas possible.⠀ ⠀ Playoffs ⠀ 2 week World Series. Like Super bowl week. ⠀ ⠀ 10 teams round robin format College World Series kinda style at the new Texas Stadium or whatever stadium/ stadiums are best. 3 game series. You win the series you move on. You lose you play the other loser in a 1 game wildcard. Winner of that moves on. Other team is out. ⠀ Or you could play it in Vegas so you have the Strip Hotels and could use one hotel for all the guys and contain possibly? ⠀ ⠀ 2 teams left 7 game World Series. They get 2 days off before the series. With those 2 days off you do a All Star Game and homerun derby. Could do the MLB awards as well at that time. ⠀ ⠀ Open this up on all platforms. No blackouts. Open it for everybody to watch. ⠀ Then you back up season the next 2 years. May 1st 2021. April 1st 2022. Maybe I'm crazy. Just fun to think about and throw around ideas🤪

A post shared by Bryce Harper (@bryceharper3) on

As blue-sky speculation goes, there are things we should all like about Bryce's plan. A lot of baseball? If everyone's playing 135 games, definitely. (Of course, there's that nagging question in the back of my mind: Does America need 135 Marlins games? We'll put that aside for now.) And Sunday doubleheaders? Paging Ernie Banks, this sounds glorious, even if it means you put seven-inning games on the books.

That isn't the only thing Harper is ready to shake up -- he's open-minded on the universal DH, and he seems to buy into the postseason tournament proposal that has won a few converts during the shutdown. And no TV blackouts? Thank you, a man who gets how self-spiting MLB's blackout rules are in practice.

Harper's plan for the postseason at least notionally ends things no later than Nov. 30, potentially using a neutral site -- surprise, the Las Vegas native floats Las Vegas. Of course, that would come with other consequences, like a World Series likely to be an unending series of slugfests. Vegas might not have the weather-related problems we'd worry about at the end of November in most venues, but would we really want postseason baseball played in one of the Triple-A Pacific Coast League's most high-octane, high-scoring environments?

So Bryce is pretty flexible on things that, just a few months ago, we might have imagined as unchangeable about the game, and good on him. If we're going to get a baseball season, we're all going to need to be adaptable.

Of course, it doesn't address all the stuff that still needs to be negotiated, like the revenue split MLB has pitched to the players, which some have rejected outright and the union sees as a salary cap, which it would fight. And he doesn't get into the details about the testing regime, which are still being sorted out. Let's be generous and remember that even with Bryce Harper's paydays, that's probably above his pay grade.

But to take this seriously, you have to sweat the details. Where are they playing this season? In the 30 MLB stadiums? Or one group of teams in Florida and the other in Arizona? Expecting all 20 states with MLB teams, the province of Ontario and the District of Columbia to all be opened up and ready to roll by July 1 might be doable, maybe not, but let's grant him that.

So if you're doing a 15-15 split of MLB teams between the East and West, you run into two inescapable logistical facts: This would totally hose the West teams as far as travel is concerned, and with 14 teams based in the Eastern time zone and 16 in the Central, Mountain or Pacific zones, one of those 16 gets assigned to the East. Maybe you split the two Chicago teams up or put the Brewers or Cardinals in the East. With the long flights teams in the West wouldn't be able to avoid, you might expect all four teams to volunteer to go East.

With that travel schedule, you have just that one day off every other week, which if you're playing in all 30 sites means every team is still traveling between sites at least twice a week and also playing doubleheaders every Sunday. That will be especially brutal for the teams in the West, but even with the expanded rosters Harper proposes, is it reasonable to expect pitching staffs to fire on all cylinders with one day off every 14? Or does this turn the regular season into even more of a test of pitching staff depth for all 30 teams? Because even with the new three-batter minimum rule -- remember that? -- we'll be asking all 30 managers to handle their staffs responsibly in a schedule that won't have much wiggle room. And if we're playing regular-season baseball into mid-November, what do you do about the inevitable rainouts or pennant-race-derailing snowouts?

So there are things to embrace about Bryce's plan, not least the flexibility about what comes next that it represents. And there are things about it that probably wouldn't work so well. But it's a place to start a conversation, and as long as we're talking about a future with baseball in it, that by itself is something we can all cheer for.