![]() |
| | Tuesday, February 22 | |||||
Special to ESPN.com | ||||||
| Few hotter political issues have raged in recent days than the
furor over the Confederate flag flying over South Carolina's Statehouse.
USA Track and Field has been forced to sidestep the mess. While the organization has denounced the flying of the flag, it will still stage the women's Olympic Trials Marathon in Columbia on Saturday. Believe me, USATF would sooner be anywhere else, but it locked into the Columbia location long before the flag became a national issue. The flag controversy, many hope, will not affect the race, which on a quadrennial basis maintains its reputation as one of the most exciting road contests in existence. Over 200 of the nation's top female runners will gather, and the stakes will drive many of them to overachieve in spectacular fashion. While money is at stake ($250,000), the more important lure is the Olympic team itself. Experts and fans will try to predict which of the women will rise to the occasion, but these predictions bear a resemblance to lottery tickets. The experts who are supposed to be right rarely are. Instead, some 13-year-old kid in Sarasota, Fla., will probably be the only person to correctly forecast the top three finishers. And no one's going to believe that kid. I wouldn't. The race, however, will surely please those who watch it. Some big favorites will bomb, while some unknowns will rise to the top. Recent race form means nothing in the marathon, because racing long distances in the months before the "Big One" simply doesn't happen very often. Training form means a great deal, but no one has seen all of the top people training, and none of the top runners are volunteering anything. So we have to wait and see.
Walking coverage not forthcoming Strong language aside, Masback bemoaned the fact that the media ignored what turned out to be a great walk competition when there are 70 million Americans who are fitness walkers. Masback is off the mark. Just because people walk doesn't mean they want to watch other people walk. I mean, I'm a lifelong breather, and I'm not hoping for any media coverage of breathing championships.
Cross country hurting for coverage? Last week, however, the IAAF decided to cancel next year's Cross Challenge, because many of the participating nations have experienced problems with the cost of hosting the events. The IAAF Council has not indicated if the cancellation is a permanent move. That sponsors aren't flocking to back cross country events can't be too surprising. However, the IAAF's acknowledgement of the situation certainly will leave cross country's small but devoted fan base disappointed.
The Mailbag Response: Good points all, and the notion that differing income potential in various events affects an athlete's career choices is firmly grounded in reality. It brings to mind a thought once expressed by a former editor of mine: "All events are not created equal."
Jeff Hollobaugh, former managing editor of Track and Field News,
is a regular contributor to ESPN.com. He can be reached by e-mail
at michtrack@aol.com.
| ALSO SEE Track: Getting short on long-jumpers Track: A record to run with Track: Spring beckons -- in January Track: Mills' race was century's best Track: Sprint stars in a spat Track: Lewis bashes sport that honors him Track: Saving America's lost talents Track: Have Olympic hopes? Join the club Track: Rankings don't rate well Track: Agents need PR training Track: A little help from her friends Track: How low can Loroupe go? Track: Show Szabo the money ![]() | |||||