David Aldridge

NBA
Scores
Schedule
Standings
Statistics
Transactions
Injuries
Players
Message Board
NBA en espanol
FEATURES
Lottery/Mock draft
Power Rankings
NBA Insider
CLUBHOUSE


ESPN MALL
TeamStore
ESPN Auctions
SPORT SECTIONS
Tuesday, May 7
Updated: May 8, 12:56 PM ET
 
Iverson, Brown should shut up or part ways

By David Aldridge
Special to ESPN.com

Allen Iverson wants to win. To him, practice means nothing.

Larry Brown wants to win. To him, practice means everything.

Allen Iverson
Allen Iverson doesn't want to spend the summer worrying about a trade.

Iverson, Brown and Sixers general manager Billy King spent all of Tuesday trying to iron out their differences, and then Iverson got in front of the Philly media, and he spewed. Man, did he spew. About Brown. About the media. And about practice. Did you catch the hundred or so references to practice?

But separate the heat from the words, and what did he really say?

He didn't demand a trade.

He didn't demand a new coach.

As much as Brown wants this to be about Iverson, it's really about him.

For six years, he's told anyone who would listen about how crazy Iverson drives him. Well, it's time to do something about it.

I have no doubt that Brown truly believes that practice is sacrosanct. I know his Dean Smith roots are deep, and, like everyone else in the Carolina Cult, he believes there is one right way to play. And that is his right. He has earned that by being the best coach in basketball. Not the best coach in the NBA -- the best coach in basketball. Period.

But he is not being consistent here.

If Allen Iverson is truly this bad, this much of a pest, this unreliable, this untrustworthy, then trade him. Now. And live with the consequences. Otherwise, you aren't serving the best interests of the fans that fill First Union Center and root with their hearts out for your team. (By the way, Ed Snider and Comcast have to know that there is no one -- no one -- in the NBA that will sell more tickets and generate more passion than the guy they have there right now. Don't give me Kobe Bryant, whom Philadelphians seem to hate, or Vince Carter, who is Smooth Jazz to Ive's Outkast.)

Every year, teams make decisions. The Suns decided last summer that they couldn't live one more second with Jason Kidd. Right or wrong -- and wrong looks like it's winning by Secretariat-like lengths here. The Wizards made a decision that Chris Webber wasn't worth the trouble, and moved him. Right or wrong -- and wrong is winning by Nixon in '72 proportions right now. (Notice how big talent guys who get moved usually wind up on their feet, while the guys who rationalized trading them are consigned to the scrap heap?)

I was talking with a Western Conference coach on Tuesday, before Iverson's press conference. There's a guy on this coach's team that he cannot stand. But the coach said he'd be more than willing to put up with it, like Nate McMillan did with Gary Payton, if the guy had Payton-league talent. Which he does not.

This is where Brown has to show his cards.

Either Iverson is worth all the trouble, or he isn't. If he isn't, Brown -- who has the juice in Philly, make no mistake about that -- should get on the phone and stay on the phone until he has a deal. If Iverson is worth the trouble, then Brown needs to stay quiet. But enough with all this talking.

And this he said-he said talk covers up a larger issue.

The Sixers were subpar this season, and they pointed to injuries all season long, but there was more wrong with Philly than Derrick Coleman's knee problems. This team -- assembled by Brown and King -- was not as good as the 2001 team, also assembled by Brown and King. They have to take responsibility for that. This team did not defend as well, and it still didn't shoot, and this time, it cost them.

I know that the purpose of the game is not to take 3-point shots, but the best shots. Still, the Sixers have too many possessions during which they depend on Iverson to bail them out with the shot clock going down. They have to get someone else on the floor who is a scoring threat. That's not heresy; that's physics. Two people who can score spread the floor and create open looks for everyone.

Iverson is not without fault. He said Tuesday that he doesn't have a selfish bone in his body, but he was the one who didn't have surgery on his elbow until training camp, leaving the team without its star player the first month of the season.

And Iverson may think he's the only star player in the league to be criticized, but he's just 26: he doesn't remember when the wags in L.A. called Magic Johnson "Tragic Johnson" after the Lakers lost in the '84 Finals. Or that Isiah Thomas was too small to lead a team to a title. Or that Michael Jordan, according to the conventional wisdom circa 1990, didn't make his teammates better. But Ive should see Kevin Garnett getting raked over the coals in Minnesota for six straight first-round flameouts. Or Allan Houston getting crushed because of his $100 million contract.

This is what the best player has to go through.

Playoffs stir up emotions
But there is another point as well: This is what losing in the playoffs does to people.

Winning is the plasma of the NBA. You read and hear about how the league is filled with guys who care about nothing but their paycheck, and then you see what's happened the last few days, and you know that's not true.

  • Tracy McGrady goes nuts, saying Charlotte's Baron Davis wasn't the best player in the series: "I am. No question, no question. If you look at Baron's team, and you look at my team, then you'll understand he has a lot of help. He has guys that can score, he has guys that can rebound on a night-to-night basis."

    Was he lying?

  • Reggie Miller goes ballistic after dropping a 35-foot banker at the buzzer on the Nets wasn't enough to win Game 5 of that first-round series: "I should have been more selfish down the stretch and took more shots," Miller said. "I put others in the position to make plays and that's why we lost ... Our younger guys didn't respond when they had to. That's very discouraging to me because I feel we have the best young guys in the league. We needed plays down the stretch and we couldn't come up with the big play."

    Was he wrong?

  • You had to see Jerry Stackhouse at his locker at the end of the Detroit-Toronto series. He was exhausted. He had had one of the worst games a good player could have in a deciding-game situation. But he'd only taken 10 shots (what would have happened in the '94 Finals if John Starks had been as discriminating?) and he'd dished out seven assists. Still, he knew full well what the headlines would have been the next day if Corliss Williamson hadn't bailed him out down the stretch.

    "I ran every possible scenario through my mind about this game," Stack said. "Sometimes we won, sometimes we lost."

    Outside the locker room, Joe Dumars was acknowledging that that one victory legitimized everything the Pistons had done this season, and that losing the game would have made the season a waste.

    "There would have been questions and doubts if we had not won the series," Dumars was saying.

    This is what the playoffs does to a man. There is a texture to the postseason. It brings out the best and worst in people. The passions are at the surface. Everyone is on edge. The chance to win is what legitimizes a man, not the bling-bling, and not the paycheck.

    The great players want to win with a desire that I simply cannot explain to you.

    "This is something that I couldn't have told them," said Dumars, the '89 Finals MVP. "I can't explain it to those guys. As much as I've been through it, I couldn't explain it to them. They had to go through it themselves ... it's a different smell, it's a different feel. The aura is different. The emotions are different.

    "If this game was played in February the emotions that you see around here right now, there's no way you can emulate those emotions in the regular season. You can only get these emotions in the playoffs."

    Which is why, I think, when Larry Brown has had time to really ponder over it through this summer, he'll realize that Iverson driving him nuts is better than, say, Vince Carter being sane and nice.

    David Aldridge is an NBA reporter for ESPN.





  •  More from ESPN...
    JaxLine: Why can't Larry, A.I. just get along?
    The long saga between Allen ...
    Wojnarowski: Trading The Answer isn't
    Larry Brown demanded complete ...

    Vitale: Time for Iverson to grow up
    When is the soap opera going ...

    Iverson seeks to put an end to trade talk
    Allen Iverson met with coach ...

    Brown: Iverson needs to set example, or play elsewhere
    One day after the defending ...

    David Aldridge Archive

    AUDIO/VIDEO
    Video
     Full of Answers
    Allen Iverson's intensity in practice may be in question, but he gives 110% behind the microphone.
    Standard | Cable Modem

     Practice makes perfect
    Allen Iverson is amazed everybody is talking about "practice."
    Listen

     Still a Sixer
    Allen Iverson describes the problems he has with the latest media scrutiny.
    Listen



     ESPN Tools
    Email story
     
    Most sent
     
    Print story
     
    Daily email