![]() |
![]() |
![]() Friday, May 17 Updated: May 17, 3:07 PM ET Kings, Nets just can't match up ESPN.com What's the first thing you notice when you see ESPN's Fred Carter on NBA 2Night or SportsCenter? Of course, he points at you. It's his way of saying hello. So we've asked NBA expert Fred to greet us and make some points for ESPN.com each week.
1. Which matchups will ultimately decide the conference finals?
But Shaq scares Sacramento the most. Look for him to be a major factor. In the San Antonio series, the Spurs had Tim Duncan and David Robinson to challenge Shaq's shot. But the Kings have no one to challenge him. There are also some some terrific matchups in the Boston Celtics-New Jersey Nets series. First of all, there's a mismatch between Jason Kidd and Kenny Anderson. Anderson is too slight and small to guard a guy as big and powerful as Kidd. Meanwhile, it will be difficult for New Jersey to control Paul Pierce and Antoine Walker. New Jersey lacks the athletic players to guard these two guys. Pierce and Walker can both play one-on-one and they're good ball-handlers who get to the basket. Keith Van Horn lacks the lateral quickness to guard them. Kenyon Martin is an inside player who'll be like a fish out of water if he has to go outside and guard them. I give the advantage to Boston in this series.
2. How vital are Bobby Jackson and Hedo Turkoglu to the Kings? In last year's playoffs, Rick Fox did an outstanding job shutting down Stojakovic. It's up to Fox to do the same with Turkoglu this year. If Fox can do that again, Sacramento could have a problem.
3. How much will home-court advantage matter in these series?
4. Who, on each conference finalist, must step up their game? Mike Bibby, who's had a great postseason and played extremely well against Dallas, must continue to step it up and play the way he's been playing. Against Dallas, we saw Bibby grow up. If he can keep it up against the Lakers, Sacramento will have a great chance.
5. Who will be advancing to the 2002 NBA Finals? In the Celtics-Nets series, I like the underdog Celtics to advance. Boston has played well defensively all year: third in the league in defensive field-goal percentage (meaning they don't give up a lot of quality shots), first in steals, second in forcing turnovers and fifth in the league in defensive rebounding. The Celtics are a complete defensive team with two tremendous offensive players. |
| |||||||||||||
|
| ||