![]() |
|
| Monday, January 20 Updated: January 30, 12:33 AM ET Forecasting the field of 64 By Charlie Creme Special to ESPN.com |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Projecting the 64 teams that will comprise the NCAA Tournament field in January is like looking at a half-drawn picture. It's like seeing the first half of a movie and then writing the review, or declaring an election winner without all the ballots counted correctly.
Oh wait -- we've done that. With that in mind, however, here's our take on which teams will get their names called on Selection Sunday (based on information and games played through Jan. 19). Using the same formula and path we think the women's selection committee will take just less than two months from now when the real 2003 NCAA Tournament bracket is unveiled, we see Connecticut, Duke, Tennessee and Texas Tech as No. 1 seeds, although the Huskies will most likely stay in the East Region and bump the top-ranked Blue Devils to New Mexico in the Midwest. Also, the Lady Vols could end up facing another SEC rival in the Elite Eight, but we'll get to these controversial decisions in a minute. We looked at each region as if the season were to end today and build a bracket using all the criteria the committee uses: overall record, RPI, conference record, strength of schedule, road record, nonconference record, record in the last 10 games, record against the RPI top-50, record against the RPI 51-100, bad losses (those against teams lower than 100 in the RPI), and, what we like to call, really bad losses (those against teams lower than 200 in the RPI). Beware: This is still not an exact science, so the phrase, "if the season ended today," is a basis, but not a steadfast principle. There are exceptions, largely because the conference season is still very young. Over the years, for instance, teams that don't finish with at least a .500 conference record haven't gotten into the tournament very often. Consider Michigan, which has opened the Big Ten season with a 1-3 record. The Wolverines might eventually completely play themselves out of consideration, but for now, a No. 19 ranking in the RPI is hard to ignore. Therefore, Michigan's in our bracket for now, but if the Wolverines might be in trouble if they don't get to .500 by March. This is also a unique year because, for the first time, first- and second-round sites have been predetermined. That's great for planning, but adds the twist of trying to keep teams geographically near home when the schools under consideration aren't necessarily near the cities to which they might have to be sent. Of course, that's a challenge the committee faces as well. While we've followed the principle of keeping teams close to home as much as possible, it's not always going to work out. When assigning first- and second-round sites, priority was given to the top-four seeds and never were any of those top-four seeds put at a geographic disadvantage in the opening two rounds. On a few occasions, even in this first go-round, teams had to be moved a seed in one direction or another to better serve geography or to avoid inter-conference matchups in the first three rounds. Of course, competitive fairness and balance were not compromised. That's still the first priority. Some other topics that will be issues from now until Selection Sunday (And don't worry: If your team didn't make the cut, there's still hope. We'll forecast the bracket two more times between now and March 16):
Tennessee isn't necessarily the top No. 1 seed, but since the Lady Vols are the overall No. 1 in CollegeRPI.com's ratings, and also rank first in strength of schedule, that argument could be made -- despite the three losses. By putting Tennessee and LSU in the same region, our intent was to reward North Carolina, Stanford and Kansas State and their superior profiles by not sending them to Knoxville. Removing Tennessee from the Mideast and out of Thompson-Boling altogether might be the most fair solution, but the committee has set the precedence of keeping schools at home, even in the regionals if they were selected to host (ie. Iowa State and Duke last season).
With more games played, especially in the very competitive conferences, profiles begin to show some degree of separation and these difficult decisions will be based on more than one category. But for now, that's how we came up with ESPN.com's first NCAA Tournament bracket projection. Let the debate begin. Charlie Creme was a writer and editor at Blue Ribbon College Basketball Yearbook for 11 years. He can be reached at cwcreme@hotmail.com. |
|
|||||||||||||||||