Broncos players sue NFL over bans

DENVER -- Two Denver Broncos players are suing the NFL seeking to overturn their drug suspensions.

The lawsuit filed in Denver District Court contends the league violated protocol in collecting urine samples from linebacker D.J. Williams and defensive lineman Ryan McBean and refused to clear the players after the collector was fired for not following proper procedures.

Williams and McBean were suspended without pay for Denver's first six games of the 2012 season.

Williams' lawyer, Peter R. Ginsberg, said the league contends the urine samples they provided to an NFL specimen collector for testing in August weren't from a human. Ginsberg said the specimen collector said he watched Williams void directly into the specimen bottle, so it would've been impossible for the specimen to be non-human.

The collector has since been fired by the league for dereliction of duty, but the hearing officer, Harold Henderson, who works in the commissioner's office, ruled against the players, whose appeal was denied.

Williams and McBean filed suit this week against the NFL asking that their penalties, which were handed down Friday, be thrown out.

"The claims have no merit and we are confident that the discipline will be upheld and enforced as required by the policy," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said Tuesday.

The NFL Players Association also chimed in on the matter Tuesday, questioning the process followed by the NFL before the league suspended Williams and McBean for violating the policy on performance-enhancing substances. The players union said it's "disappointed" with the six-game suspensions.

The union said in its release that there was evidence of breaches in the collection protocol and other procedural irregularities. Also, the NFLPA said the league handed down the bans "even though the specimen collector was fired by his agency for not following procedures." It also called for independent arbitrators as part of any future drug testing policy.

"The NFLPA and NFL have been negotiating a new and comprehensive Substances of Abuse and Steroids policies. The facts in these two cases, and in recent cases in other sports, dramatically underscore the players' insistence to have independent, neutral arbitrators as part of any future policy. We will continue to fight for a fair, clean and safe game," the union said in its statement.

The lawsuit contends Henderson exceeded his powers and wasn't an impartial arbitrator and that errors were made in the chain-of-custody procedure. It also claims that after the players' appeals hearings, the NFL lawyer held what's called "ex parte communications" with Henderson, meaning the players' lawyers weren't present.

"The bottom line is that the NFL totally compromised the steroid policy, trampled on our clients' rights, damaged their reputations, are threatening their livelihoods and we've asked for judicial intervention to ensure against that happening," Ginsberg said.

"I don't think I've ever seen the NFL so flagrantly violate its own procedures and have no conscience with regard to punishing players without any justification," Ginsberg added. "I think that the hearing officer was answering to the commissioner and there may be vestiges of hard feelings for the (collective bargaining agreement) negotiations. Or simply, the commissioner doesn't understand that he has responsibilities to players as well as to the owners."

McBean becomes a free agent Tuesday afternoon, but with this suspension hanging over his head, his lawyer, Peter Schaffer, wonders just how marketable he will be to teams. Schaffer said the evidence in the case closed on Dec. 9, but he didn't receive a decision until February.

"I want to make emphatically clear that neither one of these players tested positive for a banned or an illegal substance. I think that's very important to point out," Schaffer said. "The damages are enormous. Forget about not just the damage to D.J.'s and Ryan's reputation, but monetarily, it's enormous."

Schaffer also compared the case to that of Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Ryan Braun, who recently won his appeal to overturn a 50-game suspension for a positive drug test.

Braun's legal team argued in a grievance hearing that the collector, Dino Laurenzi Jr., did not follow the procedures specified in baseball's drug agreement.

"The facts of this case are so much better than the facts of Braun," Schaffer said. "In Braun's case, the arbitrator ruled, based on WADA cases, that the collector made a mistake and therefore he can't punish the player, even though Major League Baseball believed the collector did not make a mistake. The collector has come out and said I did everything right and Major League Baseball has come out and said the collector has done everything right.

"In this case, the NFL fired the collector for obvious dereliction of duties. At the hearing, the NFL administrators all admitted the collector made many mistakes and that's why he was fired. And yet they still suspend these two players."

A four-game suspension for Broncos tight end Virgil Green was not addressed in an NFLPA news release. Green has said he now has been approved for the medication for which he was been suspended. Green is not party to the lawsuit filed by Williams and McBean.

Williams, who has been the backbone of Denver's defense for several seasons as the Broncos' top tackler, is livid over his suspension, Ginsberg said.

"It's a huge deal professionally and personally," Ginsberg said. "D.J. has been playing for eight years and he's never violated any test for either steroids or illegal substances. Here, the NFL is broadcasting publicly that he failed a steroids test. He's very upset."

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.