An outpouring of e-mail has arrived at the door of RPM.ESPN.com.
Some of you out there really don't like Kevin Harvick, Jeff Gordon, et al., for suggesting Ryan Newman's engineering mind could be plotting evil.
And then, many of you really don't like fuel. If cars could run in circles by, say, gravitational force, it would put you all at ease.
A few of you don't like us. But we can deal with that.
The intriguing aspect of Newman's eight victories, 75 percent of which we'll call "fuel-mileage wins," is this: Do you like the computer age of racing (which we've been in for as long as you needed a computer to plug into your car before you could begin work on it), or do you yearn for the days when telemetry was handled via sensory inputs of the buttocks?
Racing is won and lost via computer logs. Engineering extends to every aspect of what is as much science as sport. Some drivers are much better than others at being an extension of that computer guy who you invite to dinner and then wonder what he's saying 75 percent of the time. That's three quarters, to the lay person.
Newman holds a mechanical engineering degree from Purdue. Many of you have rightly pointed out this advantage should not be held against him.
Others have pointed out, and they too have a good argument, that watching Bill Elliott outdrive the field in Kansas but lose to the calculating Newman left you, well, wanting to watch golf on Sundays.
You've come to Gas and Go because you don't want a fence-sitter. You want somebody to lay his neck on the line, someone not afraid to be skewered via computer by the large number of fans on either side of this argument.
So, what is racing? Is it what Newman and his clever crew have done, playing pit stop and fuel games to give the second-year driver more wins than anyone in Winston Cup history has attained in a sophomore season?
Or should it be something more -- guts, pure speed, insanity, brawn, anything but calculating, shrewd, computer reality?
It's a tough call. Cars run on fuel. Tracks have certain degrees of banking, and races have a set distance. Yellow flags are a wild card factor. The weight of the car, horsepower and fuel mileage calculations are not wild cards unless a car has been involved in a wreck.
It's hard to hold it against Newman and his crew for winning within the rules, making better use of the factors mentioned above than their foes.
Some are upset about the comeback factor, with Newman running in 15th for much of the race and then -- BAM! -- he's the winner. You feel suckered. Your emotions were toyed with, your investment in whatever driver you like went the way of an Enron pension plan.
We feel your pain. We really do. But assuming Newman isn't cheating -- and if he is, does anyone really think NASCAR wouldn't discover it? -- it's time to accept reality. This is how it is -- the tires are hard, the fuel mileage is king, he who plays the game best wins.
Nobody blames a basketball or football team for coming back from a huge deficit and winning. Ali didn't win the rumble in the jungle by being the dominant fighter that day; he won with a plan and with guile.
If that's good enough for boxing, isn't it good enough for auto racing?