ESPN Network: ESPN.com | RPM | NBA.com | NHL.com | ESPNdeportes | ABCSports | FANTASY  
rpm.espn.com
rpm.espn.com
Winston Cup Series




Saturday, October 5

Continuing superspeedway dilemma
By Rupen Fofaria
ESPN.com

Rupen Fofaria TALLADEGA, Ala. -- Forty-some cars scream around Turns 3 and 4 doing 190 mph with, literally, inches separating them. The cars are so close that something as small as a twitch or a sneeze would wreak havoc on the field. Something as little as fishtailing out of a corner could send as many as a dozen cars hurtling at the wall.

This goes on for 500 miles as drivers clench their teeth and pray for safety.

Welcome to present-day superspeedway racing where, particularly here at Talladega Superspeedway, the conditions are so nerve-wracking that NASCAR has tried four different rules packages in the last four races at the track.

The primary objective: Break up the packs and give drivers a little more room. The secondary objective: Make the drivers race their cars, not just aim them in a circle.

In the garage area, where everyone is an expert, several drivers, crew chiefs and owners offered opinions on ways to break up the packs. But before we explore them, here is a quick tutorial on how the conditions came about.

Too fast for comfort
In 1987, Bill Elliott went barreling around Talladega at a record 212.809 mph and about half the drivers in the garage started clamoring for NASCAR to slow the cars down. That same weekend, Bobby Allison's car ran up the wall and teetered on the fence before falling back to the track.

Although Allison was not seriously injured and no one else was, either, the thought of what could have happened if Allison's car cleared the fence and ran into the thousands of helpless fans in the grandstands was so horrifying that NASCAR knew speeds needed to come down.

For the next couple races at superspeedways -- Daytona International Speedway and Talladega -- the Winston Cup Series cars were equipped with smaller carburetors. This made good cars mediocre and, therefore, closed the gap between bad cars and good cars. Fans and drivers shared disappointment in the fact that talent ceased being an issue.

Crashes are a danger at Talladega, even in Happy Hour.

That's when, for the 1988 Daytona 500, stock-car racing's most popular series began restrictor plate racing. The restrictor plate limits the amount of air that goes into the carburetor and, thereby, limits the horsepower by as much as 20 to 30 percent. At first, it was acceptable. The speeds were down and the cars were spread out, but as teams put more money into its operations and as technology advanced, the tight bunches began occurring in the mid-1990s.

Parity produces tight spots
When restrictor plate racing was first introduced, the 43rd car in the field was a world away from being as good as the first car in the field. That allowed the good cars to race together at the front of the pack and left the OK-to-bad cars spread out behind them. Today, the gap between first and 43rd is so much smaller, that putting a uniform ceiling on horsepower for every race car leaves them all in the same place -- bunched up in a tight pack.

Which brings us to NASCAR's primary objective -- breaking up the bunches. In speaking with several sources in the garage, there are four major changes that could accomplish this.

  • Get rid of the plates: Robert Yates is a huge proponent of taking the restrictor plates off of the cars and reducing the size of the engines the cars use. This would slow the cars down and leave those teams will skillful drivers, good setups and pristine equipment well ahead of weaker cars. Of course, this is a theory that has not been tested and NASCAR is not overly fond of because of the costs involved.

    Using a smaller engine at superspeedway races means race teams would have to spend millions on developing and testing an engine that they would use only four times a year. And because of the costs involved, NASCAR would have to wait two or three years after announcing such a change before it could actually be implemented.

    Still, many of the drivers who requested NASCAR to slow the cars down back in 1987 are gone, now, and many of the drivers in the garage these days would prefer to have the plates taken off. This is the only solution widely discussed which would accomplish that, so it's got some backing.

    "You can't fault (NASCAR) because they're making the effort," Ford driver Dale Jarrett said. "They're trying to listen to ideas that the teams have, but, to be quite honest, I don't know if there's a solution to do what we want. Aside from downsizing the engines considerably and get rid of the restrictor plates, I don't know that there's anything that can be done."

  • Make the car bigger: Last year, NASCAR experimented with a bigger "greenhouse," which is essential the trapezoid like structure that consists of the roof and the windows. The idea was that if this was bigger, it would punch a huge hole in the air and create more drag on the car -- slowing it down. What happened in testing, though, was the air jumped off a car punching the hole through the air and went straight from the roof of that car onto the roof of the car behind it. The air continued to jump from roof to roof for every car in a line and made the spoilers obsolete. This meant, in the draft -- which is the term for cars in a line here -- the speeds actually increased.

    In order to make this tweak work, the entire car would need to be bigger so that the air would hit the spoilers. Winston Cup Series Director John Darby is working with several race teams and is considering this option. The problem would be, though, that it would require a different body for four races of the year -- which again comes back to a question of expense.

  • Mess with the spoiler and the nose: The cheapest and easiest way to make adjustments is to change the angle of the spoiler and the dimensions of the nose, or front valance, of a car. This is the likeliest move for NASCAR, and it is something the sanctioning body is in the process of testing.

    In this, most of the focus is on the spoiler. If the spoiler angle is decreased so that it did not sit as high off the car and collect as much wind, cars would be much faster on the straightaways. This would allow them enough freedom to speed away from the packs and, therefore, keep the field spread out.

    Crash
    Tight racing has caused spectacular wrecks at Talladega, including this Busch Series crash in April.

    One possible issue would be driver-control through the corners, though, because without the spoiler it will be harder for drivers to maintain their line in the turns. But this is something NASCAR actually welcomes to a certain extent.

    Remember the secondary objective?

    Right now, the aerodynamics are such a significant factor, a driver just gets in his car, mashes the gas pedal down the entire way around the race track and points in the direction he wants to go. A shallower spoiler would place a premium on skill because drivers would need to navigate through the turns and those with the most confidence could stay on the gas further into the turns before lifting off of it than less talented drivers.

    "We're trying to get away from the aerodynamics being so much of it," NASCAR Vice President Jim Hunter said. "We would like to get the car to where guys have to drive them, not just aim them, to win."

  • Reduce the size of the "gas tank": Although the hunch is that more needs to be done, a reduced fuel cell in the cars that will race this weekend at Talladega is the first step NASCAR is taking toward finding a rules package that would break up the bunches in 2003.

    Fuel cells are now about 13 gallons, rather than 22, which will mean cars need to pit nearly twice as many times. With cars coming in and out of the pits during green-flag racing, the idea is that will spread the field out. Also, since the best teams usually have the best pit crews and turn the quickest stops, they will get out around the same time. That way, if there is a tight pack, it will be a bunch of good cars which are less likely to screw up and cause one of those massive wrecks everyone is fearful of.

    By Sunday evening, NASCAR Nation will know whether this rule should stick around for next season.

    "It makes some sense," Chevy driver Jeff Gordon said. "The lighter fuel load will force us into more green flag pit stops which should break us up from one big pack of 43 cars to a number of smaller packs. ... If we all use our heads and play it smart and do what we're capable of doing, we can put on one heck of a race -- one that the fans will enjoy and that we'll enjoy -- and come out with an exciting finish."

    Rupen Fofaria is a beat writer for The Raleigh News & Observer.

    Send this story to a friend | Most sent stories
     


  • Related
    Shrunken gas tank focus at Talladega

    Sports Mall

     

    Winston Cup Series Standings Winston Cup Series Results Winston Cup Series Schedules Winston Cup Series Drivers Winston Cup Series