![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
By David Schoenfield ESPN.com Four years ago, before the Arizona Diamondbacks had ever played a game, they traded for Matt Williams and signed him to a five-year, $45 million contract extension. They signed Jay Bell as a free agent to a five-year, $34 million contract. At the time, I criticized the signings, pointing to the length of the deals for two players who would be 32 years old in their first year with the team, and 36 (for Bell) and 37 (for Williams) in the final years of their contracts. I wrote the following for ESPN SportsZone (that was the predecessor of ESPN.com for you kids out there): Keep in mind that Bell has actually topped 15 homers just twice in his career. Keep in mind that in a couple years he will probably lack the range to play shortstop. .... Most likely, when Matt Williams is 36 he'll be hitting .230 with an extremly low on-base percentage. ... Hey, it's [Jerry Colangelo's] money. He can spend it as foolishly as he wants. I think that assessment was right on. Williams and Bell had big years in 1999 and the Diamondbacks won the NL West. But in 2001, the two combined for just 29 home runs and 111 RBI while making $17 million in salary. Williams hit .275, but does have a low on-base percentage (.314). Bell is no longer a shortstop and has lost his starting second-base job to Craig Counsell, who makes $425,000.
And Jerry Colangelo, the Diamondbacks' managing general partner? Thanks in part to Arizona's fat $81 million team payroll, he has had to make two cash calls from his partners to pay the bills, taken out a big loan from Major League Baseball and deferred millions in player salaries. Nonetheless, my prediction that "Colangelo will be wondering why his team is in last place" wasn't quite as accurate as I had hoped. (Though, to be precise, that was in reference to 2002, so don't count me out just yet.) Foolish? Well, the Diamondbacks are in the World Series. So, despite the absurd contracts for Williams and Bell, how did they do it? Can you say Johnson and Schilling? The two aces combined to go 43-12 this season. When those two didn't get a decision, the team went 49-58. To establish how much those two mean to the Diamondbacks, look at the winning percentages of all the playoff teams minus their top two pitchers: Team Aces Without Mariners Garcia/Moyer 78-34, .696 Athletics Hudson/Mulder 63-43, .594 Yankees Mussina/Clemens 58-51, .532 Indians Colon/Sabathia 60-54, .526 Cardinals Morris/Kile 55-50, .524 Astros Miller/Oswalt 63-58, .521 Braves Maddux/Glavine 55-56, .495 D-Backs Johnson/Schilling 49-58, .458 So, without those two, Arizona is about as good as the Anaheim Angels. The Diamondbacks can talk all they want about their "strategy" of bringing in veteran players like Williams and Bell and Steve Finley "who play the game right," but the fact is that this is a bad team when Johnson or Schilling isn't on the mound. True, Arizona deserves credit for bringing in those two. They signed the Big Unit as a free agent and he responded with consecutive Cy Young Awards and will probably win his third straight. And they didn't give up much to get Schilling last July: Omar Daal, Travis Lee, Nelson Figueroa and Vicente Padilla. Their other big player, of course, is Luis Gonzalez. Again, Arizona didn't give up anything to get him: Karim Garcia, whom they had originally selected from the Dodgers in the expansion draft. But does the Arizona front office really deserve credit for acquiring an MVP candidate? Not really. Check his three-year averages before joining the Diamondbacks and his three years with Arizona:
HR RBI AVG SLG
1996-1998 16 73 .266 .433
1999-2001 38 122 .324 .593Gonzalez was a pedestrian major-league outfielder who suddenly transmogrified into Joe DiMaggio. That's luck, not front-office acumen. Heck, if Gonzalez had even hit like he had in 2000, the D-Backs wouldn't have made the playoffs this year. Arizona's second-best offensive player this year was Reggie Sanders, who hit .263 with 33 home runs and 90 RBI. He signed as a free agent for $1.5 million. Considering that was a career-high in homers and that he hadn't driven in more than 72 runs since 1995, it's unlikely Arizona actually expected that kind of production. Finley is another of Arizona's high-salaried veterans. He signed as a free agent in 1999, had two big years, but tailed off this year to .275 and 14 home runs. For $5.3 million, that's not much production. And he's still signed for another year. A couple other points:
This is an old team, being carried by two terrific pitchers. But think about this: the Diamondbacks had the two best pitchers in baseball, they had an outfielder who had one of the great seasons in National League history ... and they still won just 92 games. David Schoenfield is the baseball editor at ESPN.com. |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||