MLB
  Scores
  Schedules
  Standings
  Statistics
  Transactions
  Injuries: AL | NL
  Players
  Weekly Lineup
  Message Board
  Minor Leagues
  MLB Stat Search
  MLB en espaņol

Clubhouses

Sport Sections
Wednesday, November 1
A great year for Pythagoras in 2000



Among the many things he brought us, Bill James came up with the concept of Pythagorean won-lost records. In case you don't know, Bill found that a team's winning percentage could be very accurately predicted simply using their runs scored and runs allowed totals. The reason he called it the Pythagorean method is that, in its simplest form, the relationship between runs scored, runs allowed, and winning percentage could be stated using the squares of runs scored and runs allowed:

Win Pct.= runs scored2/runs scored2 + runs allowed2

This equation accurately predicts a team's winning percentage. However, not everyone believes it. When I worked for the Orioles, I was explaining this to the baseball staff in an organizational meeting and one scout stood up and said, "you can't do that. Some teams score runs when they need them and others score them when it doesn't matter." I told him that this relationship was one of the fundamental laws of the baseball universe and saying it doesn't work was like saying you can't measure temperature with a thermometer.

Pythagoras had a pretty good year in 2000, especially in the American League. Take a look:

The Pythagorean Method
Team LG W L Pct PyW PyL Py% RS RA WDiff
Tor. AL 83 79 .512 77 85 .476 861 908 6
Bal. AL 74 88 .457 71 91 .436 794 913 3
ChW AL 95 67 .586 92 70 .570 978 839 3
NYY AL 87 74 .540 85 76 .531 871 814 2
Ana. AL 82 80 .506 81 81 .497 864 869 1
Tex. AL 71 91 .438 71 91 .437 848 974 0
K.C. AL 77 85 .475 77 85 .474 879 930 0
Min. AL 69 93 .426 69 93 .426 748 880 0
Bos. AL 85 77 .525 86 76 .528 792 745 -1
Oak. AL 91 70 .565 92 69 .569 947 813 -1
Sea. AL 91 71 .562 92 70 .569 907 780 -1
Tam. AL 69 92 .429 70 91 .437 733 842 -1
Det. AL 79 83 .488 81 81 .498 823 827 -2
Cle. AL 90 72 .556 92 70 .569 950 816 -2
NYM NL 94 68 .580 88 74 .541 807 738 6
Fla. NL 79 82 .491 74 87 .461 731 797 5
Atl. NL 95 67 .586 90 72 .557 810 714 5
St.L. NL 95 67 .586 91 71 .564 887 771 4
S.D. NL 76 86 .469 75 87 .463 752 815 1
Mon. NL 67 95 .414 66 96 .409 738 902 1
S.F. NL 97 65 .599 97 65 .597 925 747 0
Ari. NL 85 77 .525 85 77 .522 792 754 0
Mil. NL 73 89 .451 73 89 .450 740 826 0
Cin. NL 85 77 .525 87 75 .534 825 765 -2
L.A. NL 86 76 .531 88 74 .541 798 729 -2
ChC NL 65 97 .401 69 93 .424 764 904 -4
Pit. NL 69 93 .426 73 89 .448 793 888 -4
Phi. NL 65 97 .401 69 93 .428 708 830 -4
Col. NL 82 80 .506 87 75 .535 968 897 -5
Hou. NL 72 90 .444 81 81 .497 938 944 -9

In the American League, only one team finished more than three wins away from their Pythagorean record. (Just so you know, I used the slightly more accurate method which raises runs scored and runs allowed to the power of 1.83 instead of two. With a computer, changing the exponent is no big deal.) Overall, 18 of 30 teams finished within two wins of their Pythagorean record. It looks like the thermometer still works.

Eddie Epstein, a former front-office executive with the Orioles and Padres, now works as a senior sports analyst for PricewaterhouseCoopers. He can be reached at eddie.epstein@us.pwcglobal.com.