Points Against - 2010-2011


Year:
2010-11 NBA RPI Rankings
RKTEAMRPIWLPCTSOSPWRPFPAEWLEWP
1 Minnesota .434 17 65 .207 .509 30 8288 8832 21-61 .259
2 Phoenix .504 40 42 .488 .510 19 8611 8684 38-44 .465
3 New York .498 42 40 .512 .493 13 8734 8670 43-39 .530
4 Golden State .489 36 46 .439 .505 18 8477 8668 34-48 .409
5 Toronto .438 22 60 .268 .494 28 8124 8639 22-60 .266
6 Sacramento .454 24 58 .293 .508 22 8151 8589 24-58 .297
7 Washington .443 23 59 .280 .497 26 7977 8584 19-63 .230
8 Cleveland .429 19 63 .232 .495 27 7827 8566 15-67 .184
9 Houston .510 43 39 .524 .506 15 8685 8506 48-34 .585
10 Denver .531 50 32 .610 .505 6 8811 8421 56-26 .679
11 LA .477 32 50 .390 .506 21 8089 8346 31-51 .374
12 Utah .499 39 43 .476 .507 25 8153 8303 35-47 .425
13 Oklahoma City .544 55 27 .671 .502 5 8596 8285 53-29 .647
14 Indiana .483 37 45 .451 .494 16 8183 8271 37-45 .456
15 Detroit .462 30 52 .366 .494 23 7951 8246 29-53 .354
16 Brooklyn .444 24 58 .293 .494 29 7722 8234 21-61 .257
17 San Antonio .567 61 21 .744 .508 4 8502 8034 59-23 .718
18 Memphis .521 46 36 .561 .507 10 8195 8003 49-33 .597
19 Philadelphia .492 41 41 .500 .489 14 8119 7996 46-36 .563
20 Charlotte .475 34 48 .415 .495 24 7650 7978 27-55 .333
21 Dallas .555 57 25 .695 .508 9 8220 7873 55-27 .671
22 Atlanta .503 44 38 .537 .492 17 7790 7857 38-44 .465
23 LA Lakers .551 57 25 .695 .503 2 8321 7820 60-22 .736
24 Portland .529 48 34 .585 .510 8 7896 7771 46-36 .565
25 Miami .545 58 24 .707 .490 3 8369 7757 64-18 .778
26 New Orleans .523 46 36 .561 .511 12 7784 7711 44-38 .539
27 Orlando .528 52 30 .634 .493 11 8135 7687 59-23 .718
28 Milwaukee .478 35 47 .427 .495 20 7534 7603 38-44 .462
29 Chicago .555 62 20 .756 .488 1 8087 7487 64-18 .781
30 Boston .540 56 26 .683 .492 7 7913 7473 59-23 .720
Glossary
  • RK: Rank
  • RPI: Relative Percent Index
  • W: Wins
  • L: Losses
  • PCT: Win Percentage
  • PA: Points Against
  • EWL: Expected Win-Loss
  • EWP: Expected Winning Percentage
  • Relative Percent Index: The basic formula is 25% team winning percentage, 50% opponents' average winning percentage, and 25% opponents' opponents' average winning percentage.
  • Expected Winning Percentage and Win-Loss: Derived the Pythagorean 16.5 Method, the basketball adaptation of Bill James' Pythagorean theorem of baseball: Runs scored ^16.5 / (Runs scored ^16.5 + runs allowed ^16.5). This formula was designed to relate a team's points scored and points allowed to its won-lost record.